CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 868Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyMedia Influence and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unregulated Internet Usage: Addiction, Habit, or Deficient Self-Regulation?

LaRose, Robert, Lin, Carolyn A., Eastin, Matthew S.·2003·Media Psychology
DOI 10.1207/s1532785xmep0503_01
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent reports of problematic forms of Internet usage bring new currency to the problem of "media addictions" that have long been the subject of both popular and scholarly writings. The research in this article reconsidered such behavior as deficient self-regulation within the framework of A. Bandura's (1991) theory of self-regulation. In this framework, behavior patterns that have been called media addictions lie at one extreme of a continuum of unregulated media behavior that extends from normally impulsive media consumption patterns to extremely problematic behavior that might properly be termed pathological. These unregulated media behaviors are the product of deficient self-regulatory processes through which media consumers monitor, judge, and adjust their own behavior, processes that may be found in all media consumers. The impact of deficient self-regulation on media behavior was examined in a sample of 465 college students. A measure of deficient self-regulation drawn from the diagnostic criteria used in past studies of pathological Internet usage was significantly and positively correlated to Internet use across the entire range of consumption, including among normal users who showed relatively few of the "symptoms." A path analysis demonstrated that depression and media habits formed to alleviate depressed moods undermined self-regulation and led to increased Internet usage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532785xmep0503_01

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. 10.1037//0735-7028.30.2.154 · DOI
  3. Gaziano C., 1990, Mass Communication Review, 17, 2
  4. Griffiths M., 1999, Psychologist, 12, 246
  5. 10.1089/109493100316067 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hall A. S., 2001, Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 23, 312
  7. 10.1037//0003-066X.53.9.1017 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lin C. A., 1993, Mass Communication Review, 20, 39
  9. Lin C. A., 1999, Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 79
  10. 10.1037//0033-295X.106.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1037//0033-2909.124.1.54 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. & Rosengren, K. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: The past ten years. In K. Rosengren, L. Wenner, & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research (pp. 11-37). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  13. Sanders C. E., 2000, Adolescence, 35, 237
  14. Scherer K., 1997, Journal of College Student Development, 38, 655
  15. 10.1037//0033-295X.84.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Smith, R. (1986). Television addiction. In J. Bryant & D. Anderson (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 109-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Stone G., 1990, Mass Communication Review, 17, 25
  18. Wise, M. G. & Tierney, J. G. (1994). Impulse control disorders not elsewhere classified. In R. E. Hales, S. C. Yudofsky, & J. A. Talbott (Eds.), Textbook of psychiatry (2nd Ed., pp. 681-699). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  19. Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the net. New York: Wiley.
  20. Young, K. S. (1999). Evaluation and treatment of Internet addiction. In L. VandeCreek & T. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A sourcebook (Vol. 17, pp. 19-31). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
  21. Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J. (1985). Affect, mood and emotion as determinants of selective media exposure. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 157-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  22. Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J. (1994). Entertainment as media effects. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media effects (pp. 157-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 867

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
LaRose, R., Lin, C. A., & Eastin, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Cleveland State University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Media Psychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-08
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
225-253
ISSN
  • 1521-3269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-785X
DOI
10.1207/s1532785xmep0503_01
OpenAlex
W1988710891
Cited by
868
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 35
FWCI
27.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Media Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
problematic internet use, media addiction, self-regulation theory, Bandura, internet addiction, media habits, depression, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review