The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Are Modern Families Small? Toward an Evolutionary and Cultural Explanation for the Demographic Transition
Abstract
As societies modernize, they go through what has become known as “the demographic transition;” couples begin to limit the size of their families. Models to explain this change assume that reproductive behavior is either under individual control or under social control. The evidence that social influence plays a role in the control of reproduction is strong, but the models cannot adequately explain why the development of small family norms always accompanies modernization. We suggest that the widening of social networks, which has been found to occur with modernization, is sufficient to explain the change in reproductive norms if it is assumed that (a) advice and comment on reproduction that passes among kin is more likely to encourage the creation of families than that which passes among nonkin and (b) this advice and comment influence the social norms induced from the communications. This would, through a process of cultural evolution, lead to the development of norms that make it increasingly difficult to have large families.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The demographic transition arose from an increase over time in the ratio of non-kin to kin in individuals' social networks.
“They argue that the demographic transition arose from an increase over time in the ratio of non-kin to kin in individuals' social networks.”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Newson et al. 2005
Close family ties and kinship interactions especially among maternal relatives promote a culture that favors reproduction and kinship association over non-reproductive and individualistic behaviors and attitudes constituting modernity.
“Close family ties and kinship interactions especially among maternal relatives promote a culture that favors reproduction and kinship association over non-reproductive and individualistic behaviors and attitudes constituting modernity (Newson & Richerson 2009; Newson et al. 2005).”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Newson et al. 2005
Citations
Cites
Toward A Restatement of Demographic Transition Theory
Caldwell, J. C. (1976) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1971615 · Cited by 1,005
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 112
- Agadjanian, V., 2002, Gender & Society, 16, 194
- Alexander, R. D., 1979, Darwinism and human affairs
- Asch, S. E., 1951, Groups, leadership and men, 177
- 10.2307/3088919 · DOI
- 10.2307/2061908 · DOI
- 10.1016/0049-089X(92)90008-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/320818 · DOI
- 10.1093/sf/79.1.319 · DOI
- 10.1080/0032472031000150336 · DOI
- 10.1353/sof.2002.0019 · DOI
- Becker, G. S., 1960, Demographic and economic change in developed countries, 209
- Becker, G. S., 1981, A treatise on the family
- 10.1353/dem.2002.0033 · DOI
- Berrington, A., 2004, Population Trends, 117, 9
- 10.2307/2137804 · DOI
- Borgerhoff Mulder, M., 1988, Human reproductive behaviour, 405
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01357-3 · DOI
- 10.2307/2991959 · DOI
- Boyd, R., 1985, Culture and the evolutionary process
- Buss, D. M., 1996, Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles, 3
- 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x · DOI
- Byrne, R. W., 1988, Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans
- 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2000.00239.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1972148 · DOI
- Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., 1981, Cultural transmission and evolution
- 10.1126/science.239.4843.985 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/0032472031000142516 · DOI
- Coale, A. J., 1986, The decline of fertility in Europe, 1
- Coale, A. J., 1986, The decline of fertility in Europe, 31
- 10.1515/9781400886692 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1989.91.2.02a00090 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.000325 · DOI
- 10.5962/bhl.title.82303 · DOI
- 10.2307/1972119 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-349-17729-5 · DOI
- 10.2307/3707362 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00295.x · DOI
- 10.1002/evan.1360040603 · DOI
- Fortes, M., 1950, African systems of kinship and marriage, 252
- 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00209.x · DOI
- 10.1177/036319909902400406 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90048-5 · DOI
- Hajnal, J., 1965, Population in history: Essays in historical demography, 101
- 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/a010186 · DOI
- 10.1086/204646 · DOI
- Hill, K., 1996, Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people
- Hrdy, S. B., 1999, Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection
- Humphrey, N. K., 1976, Growing points in ethology, 303
- Humphrey, N. K., 1983, Consciousness regained: Chapters in the development of the mind
- Irons, W., 1979, Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective, 257
- 10.2307/2137661 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(1996)23+<91::AID-AJPA4>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02734205 · DOI
- Kertzer, D., 1997, The continuing demographic transition, 137
- 10.1080/0032472031000149536 · DOI · Paper page
- Knodel, J., 1986, Decline of fertility in Europe, 337
- 10.2307/1973084 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1971824 · DOI
- 10.1093/0199244596.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1353/dem.2001.0005 · DOI
- Kraybill, D., 1994, The Amish struggle with modernity, 1
- Krebs, J. R., 1984, Behavioral ecology, 380
- Lesthaeghe, R., 1977, The decline of Belgian fertility, 1800-1970
- 10.2307/1973316 · DOI
- Livi-Bacci, M., 1986, Fertility decline in Europe, 182
- Longman, P., 2004, The empty cradle: How falling birthrates threaten world prosperity (and what to do about it)
- Lorimer, F., 1954, Culture and human fertility: A study of the relation of cultural conditions to fertility in non-industrial and transitional societies
- 10.1002/evan.1360010507 · DOI
- Low, B., 1999, Human behaviour and adaptations: An anthropological perspective, 323
- Low, B., 2000, Why sex matters
- Lumsden, C. J., 1981, Genes, mind, and culture
- 10.1016/0162-3095(96)00044-1 · DOI
- McLaren, A., 1990, History of contraception from antiquity to the present
- 10.2307/2808010 · DOI
- National Birth Rate Commission, 1916, The declining birthrate: Its causes and effects
- Newcombe, T. M., 1943, Personality and social change
- Newcombe, T. M., 1967, Persistence and change: Bennington College and its students after twenty-five years
- Newson, L. (2003). Kin, culture and reproductive decisions. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Exeter, England.
- 10.1017/S0140525X05380058 · DOI
- Notestein, F. W., Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economics: The economics of population and food supplies, 13
- Ogburn, W. F., 1955, Technology and the changing family
- 10.1017/S0140525X00029939 · DOI
- Peter, K., 1987, The dynamics of Hutterite society
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00761.x · DOI · Paper page
- Richerson, P., 2005, Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution
- 10.1017/S0140525X05000051 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00105-8 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2000.1190 · DOI
- 10.1353/dem.2002.0010 · DOI
- Sherif, M., 1936, The psychology of social norms
- Smallwood, S., 2002, Population Trends, 108, 32
- 10.1007/BF01124383 · DOI
- Tooby, J., 1992, The adapted mind, 19, 10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0002 · DOI · Paper page
- Trivers, R. L., 1972, Sexual selection and the descent of man, 136
- 10.2307/1973405 · DOI
- Turner, J. C., 1991, Social influence
- Umble, D., 1994, The Amish struggle with modernity, 97
- 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00385-1 · DOI
- van de Walle, F., 1986, The decline of fertility in Europe, 201
- 10.2307/2137494 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X00021968 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.347 · DOI
- 10.1080/0032472031000148736 · DOI
- Watkins, S. C., 1986, Decline of fertility in Europe, 314
- Watkins, S. C., 1989, Demography as an interdiscipline, 27
- 10.2307/1971590 · DOI
- Watkins, S. C., 1991, From provinces into nations: Demographic integration in Western Europe, 1870-1960
- Westoff, C. F., 1981, Predicting fertility, 51
- Whiting, B. B., 1998, Children of different worlds
- Wrigley, E., 1981, The population history of England 1541-1871: A reconstruction
- 10.2307/213996 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000021 · Cited by 530
The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation.
Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E. W., & Kenrick, D. T. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000104 · Cited by 157
The cultural evolution of fertility decline
Colleran, H. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0152 · Cited by 124
Community-level education accelerates the cultural evolution of fertility decline
Colleran, H., Jasienska, G., Nenko, I., Galbarczyk, A., & Mace, R. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2732 · Cited by 87
“The principal mechanism driving this effect does not appear to be a greater presence of non-kin [36] or of horizontal sources of transmission [33–35] among the strong ties of ego-networks, but rather an increased frequency of interaction with more highly educated women.”
InfluentialVariation in wealth and educational drivers of fertility decline across 45 countries
Colleran, H., & Snopkowski, K. (2018) · Population Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10144-018-0626-5 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Newson, L., Postmes, T., Lea, S. E. G., & Webley, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 360-375
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W1997478529
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-27-0050)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- demographic transition, family size, reproductive behavior, social control of reproduction, family networks, social networks, cultural evolution, reproductive norms, modernization
- MeSH terms
- Culture, Decision Making, Demography, Biological Evolution, Family, Family Characteristics, Fertility, Humans, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproductive Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review