Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TARGET ARTICLE: Does the Positive Psychology Movement Have Legs?

Lazarus, Richard S.·2003·Psychological Inquiry

Abstract

American psychology seems suddenly to be enmeshed in a new ideological movement that is being referred to as positive psychology. Its premise is that if individuals engage in positive thinking and feeling and abandon or minimize their preoccupation with the harsh and tragic-that is, the stressful side of lifethey will have found a magic elixir of health and well-being. It is an old idea that has usually been popular, though we still are uncertain about the conditions under which an emotion could have major effects if any. My generation enjoyed the Hoagy Carmichael song which states You have to accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative, latch onto the affirmative, and don't mess with Mr. In-between. This is, I believe, a good general translation, not literal of course, of the main implication of the positive psychology outlook, at least as it is understood by many psychologists. I would be critical, too, if anyone was urging accentuating what is referred to as negative psychology, which would be equally unsatisfactory. As of now, the movement is, in my view, in danger of being just another one of the many fads that come and go in our field, which usually disappear in time, sometimes to return again in another form because the issues addressed are important but unresolved (Roskies & Lazarus, 1988). After a time, we will once again veer toward some other set of issues that are regarded as God's gift to advanced psychological understanding, but it too will ultimately disappear. My business here is not to speculate about why our field is like this; it just is.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327965pli1402_02

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Lazarus, R. S.
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Published
2003-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
93-109
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
OpenAlex
W2026387202
Cited by
347
References
11
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TARGET ARTICLE: Does the Positive Psychology Movement Have Legs? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327965pli1402_02
The paper
Lazarus, R. S. (2003). TARGET ARTICLE: Does the Positive Psychology Movement Have Legs? Psychological Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1402_02

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.