Cited by 38Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyInnovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical Education

Implementation and Assessment of a Spiritual History Taking Curriculum in the First Year of Medical School

King, Dana E., Blue, Amy, Mallin, Robert, Thiedke, Carolyn·2004·Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Association of American Medical Colleges has recommended addressing spirituality in the medical curriculum. DESCRIPTION: To evaluate the impact of a spiritual history-taking curriculum on the skills, knowledge, and attitudes of 1st year medical students. The study implemented a spiritual history-taking curriculum in the 1st year of medical school that included reading assignments, practice history taking, and standardized patient (SP) scenarios with spiritual content. It assessed students' performance in three ways: (a) using a videotaped SP interview, (b) a survey of students' attitudes regarding incorporating patients' religious and cultural views into medical decision making, and (c) a written test question on their first examination. EVALUATION: Students (146) took part in the medical school's spirituality curriculum, which included participation in videotaped interviews; 98% completed the initial survey, and 75% completed the follow-up survey. On the final videotaped SP interview, 65% of students were able to recognize the patient's spiritual concern according to trained faculty observers. On the attitude survey, there was an increased desire to accommodate patients' beliefs, although the magnitude of the increase was generally quite small. Ninety-four percent of students answered the test question correctly. CONCLUSION: Spiritual history taking can be integrated effectively into the existing history-taking curriculum in 1st year medical training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15328015tlm1601_13

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, D. E., Blue, A., Mallin, R., & Thiedke, C.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2004-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
64-68
ISSN
  • 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8015
OpenAlex
W2017125138
Cited by
38
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
spiritual history taking, spirituality in medicine, medical curriculum, first-year medical students, standardized patients, attitudes toward spirituality, history-taking skills
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Medical History Taking, Physician-Patient Relations, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review