Cited by 45Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipEmpathy and Medical Education

Effect of an educational intervention in “spirituality and health” on knowledge, attitudes, and skills of students in health-related areas: A controlled randomized trial

Open access
Osório, Igraíne Helena Scholz, Gonçalves, Lídia Maria, Pozzobon, Pedro Machry, Gaspar Júnior, Jair José, Miranda, Filippe Martins, Lucchetti, Alessandra L. G., Lucchetti, Giancarlo·2017·Medical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date there have been no randomized studies that assess whether "Spirituality and Health" (S/H) programs are, indeed, effective, or not. We sought to evaluate if an intervention in teaching S/H fosters competence changes in healthcare students. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was carried out. Students were randomized into two groups: an Intervention Group (a theoretical-practical course in S/H) and a control group (waiting list). Students' S/H knowledge, attitudes, and skills (through a simulated patient) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 49 students were evaluated. Students in the intervention group received higher scores on knowledge tests, felt more comfortable and prepared to talk about religious/spiritual beliefs with patients, more readily recognized importance of hospital chaplains, and more frequently held the opinion that addressing spirituality is important. Furthermore, a breaking down of S/H barriers was identified. Students also demonstrated more ability in obtaining a patient's spiritual history when compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: There were some differences on knowledge, attitudes, and spiritual history skills between students who participated in the S/H teaching strategy and students who have not been exposed to the theme. These results might foster discussion for the development of new educational strategies about the subject.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0142159x.2017.1337878

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osório, I. H. S., Gonçalves, L. M., Pozzobon, P. M., Gaspar Júnior, J. J., Miranda, F. M., Lucchetti, A. L. G., & Lucchetti, G.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
  • School of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil;
  • Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
Corresponding author
Lucchetti, Giancarlo
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2017-06-22
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
1057-1064
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2699285534
Cited by
45
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
spirituality and health, health professions education, medical students, educational intervention, spiritual history taking, religious and spiritual beliefs, hospital chaplaincy, patient communication, attitudes toward spirituality, knowledge and skills
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Health, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Learning, Students, Medical, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review