Cited by 25Musculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationInnovations in Medical EducationOphthalmology and Visual Health Research

Teaching the musculoskeletal examination: are patient educators as effective as rheumatology faculty?

Humphrey-Murto, Susan, Smith, C. Douglas, Touchie, Claire, Wood, Timothy C.·2004·Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective education of clinical skills is essential if doctors are to meet the needs of patients with rheumatic disease, but shrinking faculty numbers has made clinical teaching difficult. A solution to this problem is to utilize patient educators. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the teaching effectiveness of patient educators compared to rheumatology faculty using the musculoskeletal (MSK) examination. METHOD: Sixty-two 2nd-year medical students were randomized to receive instruction from patient educators or faculty. Tutorial groups received instructions during three, 3-hr sessions. Clinical skills were evaluated by a 9 station objective structured clinical examination. Students completed a tutor evaluation form to assess their level of satisfaction with the process. RESULTS: Faculty-taught students received a higher overall mark (66.5% vs. 62.1%,) and fewer failed than patient educator-taught students (5 vs. 0, p = 0.02). Students rated faculty educators higher than patient educators (4.13 vs. 3.58 on a 5-point Likert scale). CONCLUSION: Rheumatology faculty appear to be more effective teachers of the MSK physical exam than patient educators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15328015tlm1602_10

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Humphrey-Murto, S., Smith, C. D., Touchie, C., & Wood, T. C.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2004-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
175-180
ISSN
  • 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8015
OpenAlex
W2064187773
Cited by
25
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Keywords
musculoskeletal examination, patient educators, clinical skills teaching, medical students, OSCE, teaching effectiveness, faculty shortage, student satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Ontario, Patient Education as Topic, Physical Examination, Rheumatology, Students, Medical, Teaching, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review