Cited by 23Musculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationInnovations in Medical EducationAnatomy and Medical Technology

Musculoskeletal examination teaching by patients versus physicians: how are they different? neither better nor worse, but complementary

Open access
Oswald, Anna E., Wiseman, Jeffrey, Bell, Mary J., Snell, Linda·2011·Medical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints comprise 12-20% of primary healthcare; however, practicing physicians' MSK physical examination (PE) skills are weak. Further, there is a shortage of specialists able to effectively teach this subject. Previous evaluations of patient educators have yielded mixed results. AIMS: The aim of this study is to document how teaching by patient educators and physician tutors in MSK PE skills differs. METHODS: A qualitative researcher observed, video-recorded, and took notes during preclerkship MSK PE teaching sessions given by patient educators or physician tutors. The researcher identified themes which were evaluated by collective case study methods. RESULTS: Two patient educator and four physician groups were evaluated. The patient educators were more consistent regarding content and style than the physicians. There appeared to be a continuum in teaching organization from patient educator to novice physician tutors to experienced physician tutors. The patient educators consistently covered all major joints (physicians did not); physicians were more likely to request verbalization of actions, relate findings to history, receive questions, and use opportunistic teaching moments. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding preclerkship MSK teaching by patient educators compared to physician tutors is necessary for appropriate targeting of the existing Patient Partners® in Arthritis patient educator program and to guide the development of future MSK teaching initiatives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2011.557412

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. College des Medecins du Quebec Practice Enhancement Division 1999. Clinical practice guidelines: The musculoskeletal system. Montreal: College des Medecins du Quebec, pp. 1-11.
  2. Gruppen LD, Branch VK, Laing TJ. 1996. The use of trained patient educators with rheumatoid arthritis to teach medical students. Arthritis Care Res 9(4):302-308.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oswald, A. E., Wiseman, J., Bell, M. J., & Snell, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Oswald, Anna E.
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2011-04-25
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
e227-e235
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2149093441
Cited by
23
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • McGill University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
patient educators, medical education, patient education, arthritis, patient partners, teaching styles, joint examination
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Communication, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Physical Examination, Teaching, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review