The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Variance Frameworks in Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology: Issues and Recommendations
Abstract
Reviewed existing practices of factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), a major analytic tool used in clinical child and adolescent psychology, in the Journal of Clinical Child Psychology (JCCP) and noted several suboptimal strategies. Issues surrounding the analysis of multiple outcome variables, omnibus F tests, and single degree of freedom contrasts, simple main effects analysis, and single degree of freedom interaction contrasts were considered and recommendations were made about analytic strategies. Among the practices questioned were the use of multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) as a means of controlling Type I errors across multiple outcome variables and the use of simple main effects analysis to elucidate the nature of interaction effects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“given that doing so increases the risk of Type II errors (Jaccard & Guilamo-Ramos, 2002).”
From Specific Phobia in Young Children: Associations between the Origins of Fear and Clinical Expression of Phobia Symptoms. (2025) · cites this paper as Jaccard & Guilamo-Ramos, 2002
Citations
Cites
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
HOCHBERG, Y. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800 · Cited by 4,829
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Holmbeck, G. N. (1997) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.65.4.599 · Cited by 3,036
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
Wilcox, R. R. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2010-0-67044-1 · Cited by 2,086
Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis
Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F. C., & Tukey, J. W. (1983) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 1,906
Practical significance: a concept whose time has come
Kirk, R. E. (1996) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164496056005002 · Cited by 1,778
Designing Experiments and Analysing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective.
Freeman, G. H., Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532173 · Cited by 1,229
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1037//0003-066X.49.12.997 · DOI · Paper page
- Morrison, D. (1959). Multivariate statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- 10.1037//0033-2909.110.3.577 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals.
Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313001317097960 · Cited by 1,218
Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.
Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.7.591 · Cited by 959
Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry, C. T., Bodin, S. D., & Dane, H. E. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1023899703866 · Cited by 737
Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for phobic and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
Silverman, W. K., Pina, A. A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410701817907 · Cited by 660
Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for ethnic minority youth
Huey, S. J., & Polo, A. J. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410701820174 · Cited by 570
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaccard, J., & Guilamo-Ramos, V.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York (US)
- ORCID
- Jaccard, James
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-02-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-146
- ISSN
- 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-4424
- OpenAlex
- W1974610070
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 18.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- factorial analysis of variance, multivariate analysis of variance, type I error control
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Child, Psychology, Child, Humans, Psychotherapy, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
