The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Variance Frameworks in Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology: Issues and Recommendations
Abstract
Reviewed existing practices of factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), a major analytic tool used in clinical child and adolescent psychology, in the Journal of Clinical Child Psychology (JCCP) and noted several suboptimal strategies. Issues surrounding the analysis of multiple outcome variables, omnibus F tests, and single degree of freedom contrasts, simple main effects analysis, and single degree of freedom interaction contrasts were considered and recommendations were made about analytic strategies. Among the practices questioned were the use of multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) as a means of controlling Type I errors across multiple outcome variables and the use of simple main effects analysis to elucidate the nature of interaction effects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“given that doing so increases the risk of Type II errors (Jaccard & Guilamo-Ramos, 2002).”
From Specific Phobia in Young Children: Associations between the Origins of Fear and Clinical Expression of Phobia Symptoms. (2025) · cites this paper as Jaccard & Guilamo-Ramos, 2002
Citations
Cites
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
HOCHBERG, Y. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800 · Cited by 4,829
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Holmbeck, G. N. (1997) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.65.4.599 · Cited by 3,036
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
Wilcox, R. R. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2010-0-67044-1 · Cited by 2,086
Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis
Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F. C., & Tukey, J. W. (1983) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 1,906
Practical significance: a concept whose time has come
Kirk, R. E. (1996) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164496056005002 · Cited by 1,778
Designing Experiments and Analysing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective.
Freeman, G. H., Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532173 · Cited by 1,229
On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals.
Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313001317097960 · Cited by 1,218
Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination
Lenth, R. (2001) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313001317098149 · Cited by 1,200
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics, Tilastoseura, S., & Föreningen, S. (2010) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1111/(issn)1467-9469 · Cited by 991
Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations
Olejnik, S. F., & Algina, J. J. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1040 · Cited by 703
Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups.
Rogers, J. L., Howard, K. I., & Vessey, J. T. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.553 · Cited by 568
Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System
ROM, D. M., Tobias, R. D., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1999) · Cited by 439
Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods: Substantially Improving Power and Accuracy
Wilcox, R. R. (2010) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5525-8 · Cited by 404
Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures.
Holland, B. S., & Copenhaver, M. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.145 · Cited by 381
Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures.
Holland, B. S., & Copenhaver, M. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.104.1.145 · Cited by 371
Multiple Comparison Procedures
Toothaker, L. E. (1993) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985178 · Cited by 344
New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practicable procedures.
Seaman, M. A., Levin, J. R., & Serlin, R. C. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.577 · Cited by 326
The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review
Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2001) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711001159357 · Cited by 306
The Maximum Familywise Error Rate of Fisher's Least Significant Difference Test
Hayter, A. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478364 · Cited by 288
Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods
Wilcox, R. R. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3522-2 · Cited by 227
Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes
Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2001) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164401614001 · Cited by 219
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Reichardt, C. S., Novotny, J. A., & Wilcox, R. R. (1997) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2965738 · Cited by 197
Multivariate group comparisons of variable systems: MANOVA and structural equation modeling.
Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Arvey, R. D., & Eduardo Salas, A. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.174 · Cited by 178
Interaction Effects in Factorial Analysis of Variance
(1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485609 · Cited by 154
Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Jaccard, J. J. (1983) · Cited by 152
Self-citationEquivalence confidence intervals for two-group comparisons of means.
Seaman, M. A., & Serlin, R. C. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.403 · Cited by 142
375: Type I Error Rates When Multiple Comparison Procedures Follow a Significant F Test of ANOVA
Bernhardson, C. S. (1975) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529724 · Cited by 142
Interaction Effects in Factorial Analysis of Variance
Jaccard, J. J. (1998) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412984508 · Cited by 138
Self-citationSchafer, J. L. (2001) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10409-012 · Cited by 112
Equivalence testing for use in psychosocial and services research: An introduction with examples
Stegner, B. L., Bostrom, A., & Greenfield, T. K. (1996) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(96)00011-0 · Cited by 84
Gill, J. (2001) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412984348 · Cited by 79
Hancock, G. R., Lawrence, F., & Nevitt, J. (2000) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0704_2 · Cited by 76
Variance Stabilizing Transformations and the Power of the F Test
Budescu, D. V., & Appelbaum, M. I. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986006001055 · Cited by 50
Data transformation, Type I error rate and power
Rasmussen, J. L. (1989) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1989.tb00910.x · Cited by 49
Confidence Intervals for Correlation Ratios
Fleishman, A. I. (1980) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316448004000309 · Cited by 48
Interactions, partial interactions, and interaction contrasts in the analysis of variance.
Boik, R. J. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.86.5.1084 · Cited by 40
Wilcox, R. R. (1992) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768801 · Cited by 35
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1037//0003-066X.49.12.997 · DOI · Paper page
- Morrison, D. (1959). Multivariate statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- 10.1037//0033-2909.110.3.577 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals.
Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313001317097960 · Cited by 1,218
Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.
Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.7.591 · Cited by 959
Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry, C. T., Bodin, S. D., & Dane, H. E. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1023899703866 · Cited by 737
Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for phobic and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
Silverman, W. K., Pina, A. A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410701817907 · Cited by 660
Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for ethnic minority youth
Huey, S. J., & Polo, A. J. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410701820174 · Cited by 570
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaccard, J., & Guilamo-Ramos, V.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York (US)
- ORCID
- Jaccard, James
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-02-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-146
- ISSN
- 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-4424
- OpenAlex
- W1974610070
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 18.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- factorial analysis of variance, multivariate analysis of variance, type I error control
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Child, Psychology, Child, Humans, Psychotherapy, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
