Cited by 471Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychometric Methodologies and TestingFamily Dynamics and Relationships

A Critical Evaluation of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) in a Head Start Population

Reitman, David, Currier, Rebecca O., Stickle, Timothy R.·2002·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

Examines psychometric characteristics of the 36-item Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) in a low-income, predominantly minority population. Relations between the PSI-SF, demographic, and psychosocial factors associated with parenting stress were examined. Internal consistencies for the PSI-SF were very good to excellent. However, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that a 3-factor model comprised of Parental Distress, Difficult Child, and Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction subscales was only marginally superior to a single-factor model. A series of multiple regression analyses examining the relation of psychosocial and demographic measures to PSI-SF subscales were more supportive of the 3-factor model proposed by Abidin (1995). As anticipated, the PSI-SF Difficult Child subscale was most strongly associated with a measure of child oppositionality, and the Parental Distress subscale was most highly associated with self-reported psychological symptoms and low income. Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction was associated with parent reports of psychological symptoms as well as low income and education. The results appear to support the use of the PSI-SF with lower socioeconomic, primarily African American mothers. Additionally, the data provide indirect support for the generalizability of a 3-factor model of parenting stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15374424jccp3103_10

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reitman, D., Currier, R. O., & Stickle, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • LSU New Orleans (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2002-08
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
384-392
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W1966704309
Cited by
471
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 23
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
Parenting Stress Index-Short Form, parental stress, psychometric properties, factor structure, Head Start, low-income households, African American mothers, parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, psychological symptoms, socioeconomic status, child behavior problems
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Parenting, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review