Cited by 93Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdrenal Hormones and DisordersMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Urine steroid metabolomics as a novel tool for detection of recurrent adrenocortical carcinoma

Open access
Chortis, Vasileios, Bancos, Irina, Nijman, Thomas, Gilligan, Lorna C, Taylor, Angela E, Ronchi, Cristina L, O’Reilly, Michael W, Schreiner, Jochen +19 more·2020·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Urine steroid metabolomics, combining mass spectrometry-based steroid profiling and machine learning, has been described as a novel diagnostic tool for detection of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). OBJECTIVE, DESIGN, SETTING: This proof-of-concept study evaluated the performance of urine steroid metabolomics as a tool for postoperative recurrence detection after microscopically complete (R0) resection of ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 135 patients from 14 clinical centers provided postoperative urine samples, which were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. We assessed the utility of these urine steroid profiles in detecting ACC recurrence, either when interpreted by expert clinicians or when analyzed by random forest, a machine learning-based classifier. Radiological recurrence detection served as the reference standard. RESULTS: Imaging detected recurrent disease in 42 of 135 patients; 32 had provided pre- and post-recurrence urine samples. 39 patients remained disease-free for ≥3 years. The urine "steroid fingerprint" at recurrence resembled that observed before R0 resection in the majority of cases. Review of longitudinally collected urine steroid profiles by 3 blinded experts detected recurrence by the time of radiological diagnosis in 50% to 72% of cases, improving to 69% to 92%, if a preoperative urine steroid result was available. Recurrence detection by steroid profiling preceded detection by imaging by more than 2 months in 22% to 39% of patients. Specificities varied considerably, ranging from 61% to 97%. The computational classifier detected ACC recurrence with superior accuracy (sensitivity = specificity = 81%). CONCLUSION: Urine steroid metabolomics is a promising tool for postoperative recurrence detection in ACC; availability of a preoperative urine considerably improves the ability to detect ACC recurrence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/clinem/dgz141

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study has shown utility of urinary steroid metabolomics in the follow up of patients with ACC as a marker of recurrence.

    “A recent study has also shown the utility of urinary steroid metabolomics in the follow up of patients with ACC as a marker of recurrence (351).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [351]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chortis, V., Bancos, I., Nijman, T., Gilligan, L. C., Taylor, A. E., Ronchi, C. L., O’Reilly, M. W., Schreiner, J., Asia, M., Riester, A., Perotti, P., Libé, R., Quinkler, M., Canu, L., Paiva, I., Bugalho, M. J., Kastelan, D., Dennedy, M. C., Sherlock, M., Ambroziak, U., Vassiliadi, D., Bertherat, J., Beuschlein, F., Fassnacht, M., Deeks, J. J., Biehl, M., & Arlt, W.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • INCa-COMETE, Cochin Hospital, Institut Cochin, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale Unite ́ 1016, René Descartes University, Paris
  • Endocrinology in Charlottenburg, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (PT)
  • Hospital de Santa Maria (PT)
  • Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Evangelismos Hospital (GR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Arlt, Wiebke
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2019-10-29
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
e307-e318
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2982597248
Cited by
93
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT101671AIA)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (205/1)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • National Institutes of Health (K23DK121888)
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Birmingham (BRC-1215–2009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
adrenocortical carcinoma, recurrence detection, postoperative follow-up, R0 resection, random forest, early detection of recurrence
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Proof of Concept Study, Adrenal Cortex, Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Adrenalectomy, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Postoperative Period, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Steroids, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Biomarkers, Tumor, Adrenocortical Carcinoma, Metabolomics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review