Cited by 154Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsRenal cell carcinoma treatmentAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

The role of surgery in the management of recurrent adrenocortical carcinoma

Open access
Erdogan, Ilknur, Deutschbein, Timo, Jurowich, Christian, Kroiss, Matthias, Ronchi, Christina, Quinkler, Marcus, Waldmann, Jens, Willenberg, Holger S. +10 more·2013·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Surgery is the standard of care for localized adrenocortical carcinomas, but its role for recurrent disease is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate clinical outcome after surgery for recurrence. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis in 154 patients with first recurrence after initial radical resection from the German Adrenocortical Carcinoma Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier method and identified prognostic factors by Cox regression analysis. RESULT: A total of 101 patients underwent repeated surgery (radical resection, n = 78), and 99 received (additional) nonsurgical therapy. After a median of 6 (1-221) months, 144 patients (94%) experienced progression. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor burden, time to first recurrence (TTFR), surgery for recurrence (including resection status), and additional therapy indicated that only two factors were significantly associated with shorter PFS [hazard ratio for progression: for TTFR ≤ 12 months, 1.8 (95% confidence interval = 1.3-2.6) vs. TTFR > 12 months; for macroscopically incomplete resection, 3.4 (1.5-7.9), and for no surgery, 3.4 (1.6-7.0) vs. microscopically complete (R0)-resection and OS [hazard ratio for death: for TTFR > 12 months, 3.1 (2.0-4.7) vs. TTFR ≤ 12 months; for macroscopically incomplete resection, 2.7 (1.1-6.9), and no surgery, 4.2 (1.8-9.6) vs. R0-resection]. Patients who had both TTFR over 12 months and R0-resection of recurrent tumors (n = 22) had the best prognosis (median PFS, 24 months; median OS, >60 months). CONCLUSIONS: The best predictors of prolonged survival after first recurrence are TTFR over 12 months and R0-resection. Our data suggest that patients with longer TTFR and tumors amenable to radical resection should be operated, whereas individualized treatment decisions are needed for patients with short TTFR or with not completely resectable tumors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2012-2559

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of organs involved by tumor at the time of the first metastasis is a predictor of survival.

    “The number of organs involved by tumor at the time of the first metastasis is a predictor of survival (243, 265).”

    From Adrenocortical carcinoma (2014) · cites this paper as [265]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erdogan, I., Deutschbein, T., Jurowich, C., Kroiss, M., Ronchi, C., Quinkler, M., Waldmann, J., Willenberg, H. S., Beuschlein, F., Fottner, C., Klose, S., Heidemeier, A., Brix, D., Fenske, W., Hahner, S., Reibetanz, J., Allolio, B., & Fassnacht, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University Hospital Magdeburg (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Fassnacht, Martin
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2013-01
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
181-191
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2056952305
Cited by
154
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe
  • Freie Universität Berlin
  • Universitätsklinikum Köln
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
adrenocortical carcinoma, adrenalectomy, radical resection, time to recurrence, R0 resection, incomplete resection, progression-free survival, overall survival, prognostic factors, treatment decision-making, adjuvant therapy, resectability assessment, tumor burden
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Adrenalectomy, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Adrenocortical Carcinoma, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review