The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nuclear Binding and Retention of the Receptor Estrogen Complex: Relation to the Agonistic and Antagonistic Properties of Estriol11
Abstract
The relationship between nuclear retention or residency or receptor estrogen complexes and the agonistic and antagonistic properties of estriol was examined. Cytoplasmic estrogen receptor (Rc) and uterine weight were measured 24 and 48 h after treatment with estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), or or both hormones (E2 and E3). Levels of Rc were elevated in all groups at either time. Since levels of Rc were above control in each case, Rc does not appear to be the limiting factor in the antagonistic effect of estriol. Therefore, the effect of these steroids on translocation and retention of nuclear receptor estrogen complexes (RnE) was examined. Rats were injectd as above and RnE measured by 3[H] estradiol exchange 1, 3, and 6 h after injection. All treatments cause equal translocation of receptor of the nuclear compartment. However, by 6 h the quantity of Rn present in E2 treated animals was significantly above controls while that in E2 + E3 animals was intermediate. E3 alone failed to cause significant nuclear retention of Rn. These patterns of retention correlate with the weight and cytoplasmic receptor responses above and suggest that the short nuclear residency time of RnE3 complexes relates to the antagonism of E3. To test this, these estrogens were administered via paraffin pellets to maintain blood levels of each hormone. Levels of Rn were elevated 24 and 48 h after implant with no significant differences between treatment groups. Likewise, there were no differences in the growth response. Uterine weights were highly stimulated in all three cases (300% above control). These results indicate that E3 acts as an estrogen antagonist when injected as a bolus because of the short nuclear retention time of RnE3 complexes. However, when E3 is present continuously and RnE3 is elevated and maintained, E3 is a potent estrogen without antagonistic properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soy intake and cancer risk: A review of the in vitro and in vivo data
Messina, M. J., Persky, V., Setchell, K. D. R., & Barnes, S. (1994) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635589409514310 · Cited by 1,315
(1996) · PubMed · Cited by 323
Abnormal oxidative metabolism of estradiol in women with breast cancer.
Schneider, J., Kinne, D., Fracchia, A., Pierce, V, Anderson, K. E., Bradlow, H. L., & Fishman, J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.9.3047 · Cited by 254
Touillaud, M. S., Pillow, P. C., Jakovljevic, J., Bondy, M. L., Singletary, S. E., Li, D., & Chang, S. (2005) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1207/s15327914nc5102_6 · Cited by 68
Uptake and concentration of steroid hormones in mammary tissues.
THIJSSEN, J. H. H., LANDEGHEM, A. A. J. V., & POORTMAN, J. (1986) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb15998.x · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- CLARK, J. H., PASZKO, Z., & PECK, E. J.
- Venue
- Endocrinology
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-96
- ISSN
- 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7170
- OpenAlex
- W2073223257
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nuclear Binding and Retention of the Receptor Estrogen Complex: Relation to the Agonistic and Antagonistic Properties of Estriol11. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/endo-100-1-91
- The paper
- CLARK, J. H., PASZKO, Z., & PECK, E. J. (1977). Nuclear Binding and Retention of the Receptor Estrogen Complex: Relation to the Agonistic and Antagonistic Properties of Estriol11. Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-100-1-91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.