The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bisphenol-A and the Great Divide: A Review of Controversies in the Field of Endocrine Disruption
Open accessAbstract
In 1991, a group of 21 scientists gathered at the Wingspread Conference Center to discuss evidence of developmental alterations observed in wildlife populations after chemical exposures. There, the term "endocrine disruptor" was agreed upon to describe a class of chemicals including those that act as agonists and antagonists of the estrogen receptors (ERs), androgen receptor, thyroid hormone receptor, and others. This definition has since evolved, and the field has grown to encompass hundreds of chemicals. Despite significant advances in the study of endocrine disruptors, several controversies have sprung up and continue, including the debate over the existence of nonmonotonic dose response curves, the mechanisms of low-dose effects, and the importance of considering critical periods of exposure in experimental design. One chemical found ubiquitously in our environment, bisphenol-A (BPA), has received a tremendous amount of attention from research scientists, government panels, and the popular press. In this review, we have covered the above-mentioned controversies plus six additional issues that have divided scientists in the field of BPA research, namely: 1) mechanisms of BPA action; 2) levels of human exposure; 3) routes of human exposure; 4) pharmacokinetic models of BPA metabolism; 5) effects of BPA on exposed animals; and 6) links between BPA and cancer. Understanding these topics is essential for educating the public and medical professionals about potential risks associated with developmental exposure to BPA and other endocrine disruptors, the design of rigorously researched programs using both epidemiological and animal studies, and ultimately the development of a sound public health policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estrogen Receptor Null Mice: What Have We Learned and Where Will They Lead Us?
Couse, J. F., & Korach, K. S. (1999) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.20.3.0370 · Cited by 2,045
The Developmental Origins of Adult Disease
Barker, D. J. P. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2004.10719428 · Cited by 1,854
Exposure of the U.S. Population to Bisphenol A and 4- tertiary -Octylphenol: 2003–2004
Calafat, A. M., Ye, X., Wong, L.-Y., Reidy, J. A., & Needham, L. L. (2008) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.10753 · Cited by 1,743
In vitro molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A action.
Wetherill, Y. B., Akingbemi, B. T., Kanno, J., McLachlan, J. A., Nadal, A., Sonnenschein, C., Watson, C. S., Zoeller, R. T., & Belcher, S. M. (2007) · Reproductive Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.05.010 · Cited by 920
Self-citationExposure to bisphenol A advances puberty
Howdeshell, K. L., Hotchkiss, A. K., Thayer, K. A., Vandenbergh, J. G., & vom Saal, F. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44517 · Cited by 820
Thyroid Hormone Action Is Disrupted by Bisphenol A as an Antagonist
Moriyama, K., Tagami, T., Akamizu, T., Usui, T., Saijo, M., Kanamoto, N., Hataya, Y., Shimatsu, A., Kuzuya, H., & Nakao, K. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2002-020209 · Cited by 812
Ho, S.-M., Tang, W.-Y., Belmonte de Frausto, J., & Prins, G. S. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0516 · Cited by 796
Timms, B. G., Howdeshell, K. L., Barton, L., Bradley, S., Richter, C. A., & vom Saal, F. S. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0502544102 · Cited by 394
Palanza, P. L., Howdeshell, K. L., Parmigiani, S., & vom Saal, F. S. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.02110s3415 · Cited by 268
Vom Saal, F. S., & Bronson, F. H. (1978) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod19.4.842 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses
Vandenberg, L. N., Colborn, T., Hayes, T. B., Heindel, J. J., Jacobs, D. R., Lee, D.-H., Shioda, T., Soto, A. M., vom Saal, F. S., Welshons, W. V., et al. (2012) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2011-1050 · Cited by 3,209
Self-citationRochester, J. R., & Bolden, A. L. (2015) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1408989 · Cited by 1,524
Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis
Goodarzi, M. O., Dumesic, D. A., Chazenbalk, G., & Azziz, R. (2011) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.217 · Cited by 1,488
La Merrill, M. A., Vandenberg, L. N., Smith, M. T., Goodson, W., Browne, P., Patisaul, H. B., Guyton, K. Z., Kortenkamp, A., Cogliano, V. J., Woodruff, T. J., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-019-0273-8 · Cited by 1,005
Self-citationShanle, E. K., & Xu, W. (2011) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx100231n · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandenberg, L. N., Maffini, M. V., Sonnenschein, C., Rubin, B. S., & Soto, A. M.
- Venue
- Endocrine Reviews
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2009-02-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-95
- ISSN
- 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7189
- OpenAlex
- W1967211742
- Cited by
- 1,414
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 58.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bisphenol-A and the Great Divide: A Review of Controversies in the Field of Endocrine Disruption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/er.2008-0021
- The paper
- Vandenberg, L. N., Maffini, M. V., Sonnenschein, C., Rubin, B. S., & Soto, A. M. (2009). Bisphenol-A and the Great Divide: A Review of Controversies in the Field of Endocrine Disruption. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2008-0021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.