Cited by 146Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Natural History of β-Cell Autoimmunity in Young Children with Increased Genetic Susceptibility to Type 1 Diabetes Recruited from the General Population

Kimpimäki, T., Kulmala, P., Savola, K., Kupila, A., Korhonen, S., Simell, T., Ilonen, J., Simell, O. +1 more·2002·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and predictive value of diabetes-associated autoantibodies, such as islet cell antibodies (ICA) and autoantibodies to insulin (IAA), GAD65 (GADA), and the IA-2 molecule (IA-2A) in genetically susceptible children from the general population during the first 2 yr of life. Of 12,170 newborn infants, 1,005 with increased genetic risk of type 1 diabetes (high risk, human leukocyte antigen DQB1*02/*0302; moderate risk, DQB1*0302/x, where x = other than *02, *0301, or *0602) were monitored for ICA, IAA, GADA, and IA-2A at 3- to 6-month intervals from birth up to a minimum age of 2 yr. In addition, all 15 genetically susceptible children from the general population who had participated in regular immunological follow-up and developed clinical type 1 diabetes by the end of April 2000 were analyzed for the development of autoantibodies. Among 1,005 children, 63 (6.3%) tested positive for at least one autoantibody, 31 for ICA (3.1%), 48 for IAA (4.8%), 23 for GADA (2.3%), and 13 for IA-2A (1.3%) at least once by the age of 2 yr. Both ICA and IAA identified 95% [95% confidence interval (CI), 77.2-99.9%] of those who tested persistently positive for multiple (> or = 2) antibodies at the age of 2 yr, GADA identified 86% (CI, 65.1-97.1%), and IA-2A identified 55% (CI, 32.2-75.6%). Close to half of the antibody-positive children (29 of 63) reverted back to antibody negativity. Autoantibodies disappeared more often among those who tested positive for IAA than among those who tested positive for other autoantibodies (P < or = 0.021). Among the 15 children who developed type 1 diabetes, the disease sensitivity of ICA was 80% (CI, 51.9-95.7%), that of IAA was 93% (CI, 68.0-99.8%), that of GADA was 60% (CI, 32.3-83.7%), and that of IA-2A was 40% (CI, 16.3-67.7%). These results suggest that IAA are characterized by high sensitivity, early appearance, and high frequency of transient antibody positivity, whereas ICA detected with a thoroughly standardized assay appear to be more specific for the screening of beta-cell autoimmunity in young children with increased genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes in the Finnish population, which has the highest incidence of type 1 diabetes in the world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2002-020018

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In several cohort studies, up to 50% of children with only a single autoantibody revert to being islet autoantibody negative during follow-up.

    “In several cohort studies, up to 50% of children with only a single autoantibody revert to being islet autoantibody negative during follow-up (79,80).”

    From 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Inverse seroconversions section reports that 29 of 63 antibody-positive children (46%) became antibody-negative during follow-up, and all 29 had tested positive for only one autoantibody. The 46% figure uses all antibody-positive children as its denominator, not children with only a single autoantibody, so it does not establish the claimed rate for that subgroup. The paper also reports its own cohort and discusses other studies, rather than establishing a 50% rate across several cohorts. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Leslie RDG, Elliott RB 1994 Perspectives in diabetes: early environmental events as a cause of IDDM-evidence and implications. Diabetes 43:843-850 4578 J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2002, 87(10):4572-4579 Kimpima ¨ki et al. • ␤-Cell Autoimmunity in Young Children
  2. Greenbaum C, Palmer JP, Kuglin B, Kolb H 1992 Insulin autoantibodies measured by radioimmunoassay methodology are more related to insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus than those measured with enzyme-linked im- munosorbent assay: results of the Fourth International Workshop on the Stan- dardization of Insulin Autoantibody Measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:1040 -1044

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kimpimäki, T., Kulmala, P., Savola, K., Kupila, A., Korhonen, S., Simell, T., Ilonen, J., Simell, O., & Knip, M.
Affiliations
  • Diabetes Tutkimussaatio (FI)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Knip, M.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2002-10
Volume
87
Issue
10
Pages
4572-4579
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2090742005
Cited by
146
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, islet autoimmunity, islet cell antibodies, insulin autoantibodies, GAD65 antibodies, IA-2 autoantibodies, genetic susceptibility, HLA-DQB1, infants, autoantibody persistence, disease prediction, natural history (disease), disease specificity
MeSH terms
Aging, Autoantibodies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Humans, Infant, Insulin Antibodies, Islets of Langerhans, Isoenzymes, Autoimmunity, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review