Cited by 217Hormonal and reproductive studiesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Serum Testosterone Assays—Accuracy Matters

Matsumoto, Alvin M., Bremner, William J.·2004·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

By its very nature, endocrinology is a specialty that relies on sharp and comprehensive clinical and investigative skills and particularly on accurate, precise, sensitive, and reliable measurements of circulating hormone concentrations. With the realization that manifestations of endocrine disease may be subtle and affected by comorbid illness, medications, aging, and other factors that cloud clinical diagnosis, rugged and robust hormone assays are especially important to the clinician. Even in the presence of obvious classical manifestations of endocrine disease, reliable laboratory studies are needed to confirm the diagnosis. Serum testosterone (T) assays play an important role in the clinical evaluation of a number of very common endocrine disorders. In males, T assays are used primarily to confirm the diagnosis of hypogonadism, and also to evaluate boys with delayed or precocious puberty and monitor the adequacy of T therapy. Because the clinical manifestations of androgen deficiency are nonspecific, the presence of low serum T levels in men with symptoms and findings consistent with androgen deficiency confirms the diagnosis of hypogonadism. In females, T assays are used in the evaluation of hyperandrogenism (e.g. idiopathic hirsutism, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and androgen-secreting ovarian or adrenal tumors), and more recently, to diagnose androgen deficiency. The very low circulating T concentrations in boys and females (over an orde…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2003-032175

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsumoto, A. M., & Bremner, W. J.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2004-02
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
520-524
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2005966256
Cited by
217
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
serum testosterone, assay precision, immunoassay interference, free testosterone, total testosterone, hypogonadism diagnosis, androgen deficiency, hyperandrogenism, automated immunoassay, immunoassay standardization
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Immunoassay, Male, Mass Spectrometry, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review