Cited by 28Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesSmoking Behavior and CessationPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Nicotine Inhibits Pulsatile Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in Human Males But Not in Human Females, and Tolerance to This Nicotine Effect Is Lost within One Week of Quitting Smoking

Funabashi, Toshiya, Sano, Akane, Mitsushima, Dai, Kimura, Fukuko·2005·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Despite having increased knowledge of the adverse reproductive effects of smoking, it is unclear whether nicotine affects the pulsatile LH secretion in humans. We addressed this issue in male and female smokers and nonsmokers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine male and 16 female nonsmokers and smokers were recruited as volunteers. In male smokers, nicotine effect was also studied before and after quitting smoking. In females, cyclic ovulatory function was assessed by measuring basal body temperature, and sampling studies were performed during the follicular phase. In the morning of the sampling day, an iv catheter was inserted into an anterobrachial vein, and blood samples (1.0-1.5 ml each) were taken at 10-min intervals for 480 min, during which, at 240 min, nicotine was administered via a transdermal patch (Nicotinell transdermal therapeutic system) containing 17.5 mg nicotine. Plasma LH was measured by immunoradiometric assay kits. RESULTS: Nicotine significantly lengthened the interpulse interval of pulsatile LH secretion in male nonsmokers but not in female nonsmokers. In male smokers, nicotine did not lengthen the interpulse interval, and in female smokers it was also ineffective. After quitting cigarette smoking in male smokers, the refractory to nicotine effect disappeared within 1 wk. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that nicotine inhibits pulsatile LH secretion only in males, and the tolerance developed to the nicotine effect disappears within 1 wk of quitting cigarette smoking. However, we cannot deny the possibility that nicotine effect would have been detected in females if more subjects had been studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2005-0041

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Funabashi, T., Sano, A., Mitsushima, D., & Kimura, F.
Affiliations
  • Yokohama City University (JP)
  • International University of Health and Welfare (JP)
Corresponding author
Kimura, Fukuko
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2005-07
Volume
90
Issue
7
Pages
3908-3913
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2105827221
Cited by
28
References
46
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Smoking Research Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
nicotine, luteinizing hormone, pulsatile LH secretion, smoking, sex differences, nicotine tolerance, smoking cessation, interpulse interval, nicotine patch, reproductive endocrinology, follicular phase
MeSH terms
Drug Tolerance, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Male, Nicotine, Sex Characteristics, Smoking, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review