The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association between Vitamin D Deficiency and Primary Cesarean Section
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: At the turn of the 20th century, women commonly died in childbirth due to rachitic pelvis. Although rickets virtually disappeared with the discovery of the hormone vitamin D, recent reports suggest vitamin D deficiency is widespread in industrialized nations. Poor muscular performance is an established symptom of vitamin D deficiency. The current U.S. cesarean birth rate is at an all-time high of 30.2%. We analyzed the relationship between maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] status, and prevalence of primary cesarean section. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2007, we measured maternal and infant serum 25(OH)D at birth and abstracted demographic and medical data from the maternal medical record at an urban teaching hospital (Boston, MA) with 2500 births per year. We enrolled 253 women, of whom 43 (17%) had a primary cesarean. RESULTS: There was an inverse association with having a cesarean section and serum 25(OH)D levels. We found that 28% of women with serum 25(OH)D less than 37.5 nmol/liter had a cesarean section, compared with only 14% of women with 25(OH)D 37.5nmol/liter or greater (P = 0.012). In multivariable logistic regression analysis controlling for race, age, education level, insurance status, and alcohol use, women with 25(OH)D less than 37.5 nmol/liter were almost 4 times as likely to have a cesarean than women with 25(OH)D 37.5 nmol/liter or greater (adjusted odds ratio 3.84; 95% confidence interval 1.71 to 8.62). CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency was associated with increased odds of primary cesarean section.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holick, M. F. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra070553 · Cited by 13,720
Self-citation
Cited by
Vitamin D for health: a global perspective
Hossein-nezhad, A., & Holick, M. F. (2013) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.011 · Cited by 1,298
Self-citationSunlight and Vitamin D: A global perspective for health
Wacker, M., & Holick, M. F. (2013) · Dermato-Endocrinology · doi:10.4161/derm.24494 · Cited by 1,156
Self-citationMaternal Mineral and Bone Metabolism During Pregnancy, Lactation, and Post-Weaning Recovery
Kovacs, C. S. (2016) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2015 · Cited by 544
Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy
Palacios, C., Kostiuk, L. K., & Peña-Rosas, J. P. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008873.pub4 · Cited by 377
Vitamin D: Before, during and after Pregnancy: Effect on Neonates and Children
Mansur, J. L., Oliveri, B., Giacoia, E., Fusaro, D., & Costanzo, P. R. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14091900 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Merewood, A., Mehta, S. D., Chen, T. C., Bauchner, H., & Holick, M. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 940-945
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2023266915
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.