Cited by 50Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPancreatic function and diabetesAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Higher Acute Insulin Response to Glucose May Determine Greater Free Fatty Acid Clearance in African-American Women

Open access
Chow, Carson C., Periwal, Vipul, Csako, Gyorgy, Ricks, Madia, Courville, Amber B., Miller, Bernard V., Vega, Gloria L., Sumner, Anne E.·2011·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Obesity and diabetes are more common in African-Americans than whites. Because free fatty acids (FFA) participate in the development of these conditions, studying race differences in the regulation of FFA and glucose by insulin is essential. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether race differences exist in glucose and FFA response to insulin. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a clinical research center. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four premenopausal women (17 African-Americans, 17 whites) matched for age [36 ± 10 yr (mean ± sd)] and body mass index (30.0 ± 6.7 kg/m²). INTERVENTIONS: Insulin-modified frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance tests were performed with data analyzed by separate minimal models for glucose and FFA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Glucose measures were insulin sensitivity index (S(I)) and acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg). FFA measures were FFA clearance rate (c(f)). RESULTS: Body mass index was similar but fat mass was higher in African-Americans than whites (P < 0.01). Compared with whites, African-Americans had lower S(I) (3.71 ± 1.55 vs. 5.23 ± 2.74 [×10⁻⁴ min⁻¹/(microunits per milliliter)] (P = 0.05) and higher AIRg (642 ± 379 vs. 263 ± 206 mU/liter⁻¹ · min, P < 0.01). Adjusting for fat mass, African-Americans had higher FFA clearance, c(f) (0.13 ± 0.06 vs. 0.08 ± 0.05 min⁻¹, P < 0.01). After adjusting for AIRg, the race difference in c(f) was no longer present (P = 0.51). For all women, the relationship between c(f) and AIRg was significant (r = 0.64, P < 0.01), but the relationship between c(f) and S(I) was not (r = -0.07, P = 0.71). The same pattern persisted when the two groups were studied separately. CONCLUSION: African-American women were more insulin resistant than white women, yet they had greater FFA clearance. Acutely higher insulin concentrations in African-American women accounted for higher FFA clearance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2011-0532

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • African Americans compared to European Americans have higher AIRg.

    “Additionally, AA compared to EA as a group, have higher AIRg [23], which has been attributed to both greater beta-cell responsivity and lower hepatic insulin extraction [24].”

    From Defining and Characterizing Postprandial Reactive Hypoglycemia (2026) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Glucose minimal model section reports higher AIRg in African-American than white women (642 ± 379 versus 263 ± 206; P < 0.01). The cited study included only premenopausal women, so it does not establish the unqualified comparison between African Americans and European Americans as groups. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chow, C. C., Periwal, V., Csako, G., Ricks, M., Courville, A. B., Miller, B. V., Vega, G. L., & Sumner, A. E.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Sumner, Anne E.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2011-08
Volume
96
Issue
8
Pages
2456-2463
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2167280444
Cited by
50
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hologic
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
acute insulin response to glucose, racial differences, African American women, insulin sensitivity, insulin resistance, glucose tolerance, fat mass, obesity, diabetes mellitus, minimal model analysis, premenopausal women
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Black or African American, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disease Susceptibility, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Prevalence, Glucose Intolerance, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review