Cited by 125Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and Health

ATLANTIC-DIP: Excessive Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Gestational or Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
Egan, Aoife M., Dennedy, Michael C., Al-Ramli, Wisam, Heerey, Adrienne, Avalos, Gloria, Dunne, Fidelma·2014·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Women who have diabetes mellitus during pregnancy are at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) is also emerging as a risk factor for maternofetal complications, and in 2009, the Institute of Medicine published recommendations for appropriate GWG. It is unclear whether excessive GWG confers additional risk to women with diabetes in pregnancy and whether Institute of Medicine recommendations are applicable to this population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine whether excessive GWG in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus is associated with higher adverse obstetric outcomes. DESIGN: This was an observational study. SETTING: The study was conducted at five antenatal centers along the Irish Atlantic seaboard. PARTICIPANTS: 802 women with diabetes in pregnancy participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Maternal outcomes examined included preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and cesarean delivery. Fetal outcomes included large for gestational age (LGA), macrosomia, and small for gestational age. RESULTS: Excessive GWG was noted in 59% of women. In all women, excessive GWG resulted in higher odds for LGA [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.01, 95% confidence intervals 1.24-3.25 in GDM; aOR 3.97, CI 1.85-8.53 in pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM)] and macrosomia (aOR 2.17, CI 1.32-3.55 in GDM; aOR 3.58, CI 1.77-7.24 in PGDM). Excessive GWG was also associated with an increased odds for gestational hypertension (aOR 1.72, CI 1.04-2.85) in women with GDM, and treatment with insulin further increased the odds for LGA (aOR 2.80, CI 1.23-6.38) and macrosomia (aOR 5.63, CI 2.16-14.69) in this group. CONCLUSION: We show that in the already high-risk settings of both GDM and PGDM, excessive GWG confers an additive risk for LGA birth weight, macrosomia, and gestational hypertension.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2013-2684

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]8. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, ed. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: ReexaminingtheGuidelines. Washington,DC:NationalAcadamies Press (US); 2009.
  2. [14]14. Dennedy MC, Avalos G, O'Reilly MW, O'Sullivan EP, Gaffney G, Dunne F. ATLANTIC-DIP: raised maternal body mass index (BMI) adversely affects maternal and fetal outcomes in glucose-tolerant womenaccordingtoInternationalAssociationofDiabetesandPregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab . 2012;97:E608-E612.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Egan, A. M., Dennedy, M. C., Al-Ramli, W., Heerey, A., Avalos, G., & Dunne, F.
Affiliations
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Corresponding author
Egan, Aoife M.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2014-01
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
212-219
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1967841511
Cited by
125
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6
FWCI
11.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National University of Ireland
  • Health Research Board
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
excessive gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes mellitus, pregestational diabetes, pregnancy outcomes, large for gestational age, macrosomia, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, cesarean section, small for gestational age, insulin therapy, Institute of Medicine weight gain recommendations
MeSH terms
Adult, Atlantic Ocean, Female, Humans, Ireland, Prediabetic State, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review