Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 522

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimates of In Vivo Insulin Action in Man: Comparison of Insulin Tolerance Tests with Euglycemic and Hyperglycemic Glucose Clamp Studies*

BONORA, ENZO, MOGHETTI, PAOLO, ZANCANARO, CARLO, CIGOLINI, MASSIMO, QUERENA, MARINA, CACCIATORI, VITTORIO, CORGNATI, ANGELA, MUGGEO, MICHELE·1989·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

We compared estimates of in vivo insulin action derived from insulin tolerance tests (ITT) and euglycemic and hyperglycemic glucose clamp studies in 17 normal subjects and 19 patients with various diseases characterized by insulin resistance. Fifteen subjects underwent an ITT and a euglycemic clamp study, 17 subjects underwent an ITT and a hyperglycemic clamp study, and 4 subjects underwent all 3 tests. The ITT consisted of a bolus iv injection of regular insulin (0.1 U/kg BW). The plasma glucose disappearance rate during the 3- to 15-min period following the insulin injection was taken as a measure of insulin action. In both euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamp studies, which were carried out with standard techniques, the ratio between the amount of glucose infused to maintain glycemia at the desired level and the mean plasma insulin concentration from 60-120 min (M) (euglycemic clamp studies) or 20-120 min (I) (hyperglycemic clamp studies) was used as a measure of insulin action. A close correlation was found between plasma glucose disappearance rate and the M/I ratio during either the euglycemic (r = 0.811; P less than 0.001) or the hyperglycemic (r = 0.826; P less than 0.001) clamp studies. These results suggest that the 15-min ITT is suitable as a simple and rapid estimation of in vivo insulin action when glucose clamp studies are not feasible, as in large series of subjects or serial studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem-68-2-374

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 522

Metadata

Authors
BONORA, E., MOGHETTI, P., ZANCANARO, C., CIGOLINI, M., QUERENA, M., CACCIATORI, V., CORGNATI, A., & MUGGEO, M.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1989-02
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
374-378
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2171086193
Cited by
522
References
24
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimates of In Vivo Insulin Action in Man: Comparison of Insulin Tolerance Tests with Euglycemic and Hyperglycemic Glucose Clamp Studies*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-68-2-374
The paper
BONORA, E., MOGHETTI, P., ZANCANARO, C., CIGOLINI, M., QUERENA, M., CACCIATORI, V., CORGNATI, A., & MUGGEO, M. (1989). Estimates of In Vivo Insulin Action in Man: Comparison of Insulin Tolerance Tests with Euglycemic and Hyperglycemic Glucose Clamp Studies*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-68-2-374

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.