Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New and reliable MRI diagnosis for progressive supranuclear palsy

Oba, H., Yagishita, A., Terada, H., Barkovich, A. J., Kutomi, K., Yamauchi, T., Furui, S., Shimizu, T., Uchigata, M., Matsumura, K., Sonoo, M., Sakai, M., Takada, K., Harasawa, A., Takeshita, K., Kohtake, H., Tanaka, H., Suzuki, S.·2005·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the area of the midbrain and pons on mid-sagittal MRI in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), Parkinson disease (PD), and multiple-system atrophy of the Parkinson type (MSA-P), compare these appearances and values with those of normal control subjects, and establish diagnostic MRI criteria for the diagnosis of PSP. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied MRI of 21 patients with PSP, 23 patients with PD, 25 patients with MSA-P, and 31 age-matched normal control subjects. The areas of the midbrain tegmentum and the pons were measured on mid-sagittal MRI using the display tools of a workstation. The ratio of the area of the midbrain to the area of the pons was also evaluated in all subjects. RESULTS: The average midbrain area of the patients with PSP (56.0 mm2) was significantly smaller than that of the patients with PD (103.0 mm2) and MSA-P (97.2 mm2) and that of the age-matched control group (117.7 mm2). The values of the area of the midbrain showed no overlap between patients with PSP and patients with PD or normal control subjects. However, patients with MSA-P showed some overlap of the values of individual areas with values from patients with PSP. The ratio of the area of the midbrain to the area of pons in the patients with PSP (0.124) was significantly smaller than that in those with PD (0.208) and MSA-P (0.266) and in normal control subjects (0.237). Use of the ratio allowed differentiation between the PSP group and the MSA-P group. CONCLUSION: The area of the midbrain on mid-sagittal MRI can differentiate PSP from PD, MSA-P, and normal aging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000165960.04422.d0

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 375

Metadata

Authors
Oba, H., Yagishita, A., Terada, H., Barkovich, A. J., Kutomi, K., Yamauchi, T., Furui, S., Shimizu, T., Uchigata, M., Matsumura, K., Sonoo, M., Sakai, M., Takada, K., Harasawa, A., Takeshita, K., Kohtake, H., Tanaka, H., & Suzuki, S.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2005-06-28
Volume
64
Issue
12
Pages
2050-2055
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2121046597
Cited by
375
References
22
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New and reliable MRI diagnosis for progressive supranuclear palsy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000165960.04422.d0
The paper
Oba, H., Yagishita, A., Terada, H., Barkovich, A. J., Kutomi, K., Yamauchi, T., Furui, S., Shimizu, T., Uchigata, M., Matsumura, K., Sonoo, M., Sakai, M., Takada, K., Harasawa, A., Takeshita, K., Kohtake, H., Tanaka, H., & Suzuki, S. (2005). New and reliable MRI diagnosis for progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000165960.04422.d0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.