Cited by 177Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesNeurological and metabolic disorders

Anterior cerebral artery infarction: Stroke mechanism and clinical-imaging study in 100 patients

Kang, Suk Y., Kim, Jong S.·2008·Neurology

Abstract

Background Stroke mechanisms and clinical features of anterior cerebral artery (ACA) territory infarction have rarely been investigated using MRI. Objectives To verify stroke mechanisms and to make clinical imaging correlation. Methods Clinical, MRI, and angiographic findings of 100 consecutive patients with ACA infarction were studied. Results Motor dysfunction (n = 91) was the most common symptom, and severe motor dysfunction was related to supplementary motor area/paracentral lobule involvement (p = 0.016). Hypobulia/apathy (n = 43) was related to involvement of frontal pole (p = 0.002), corpus callosum/cingulate gyrus (p = 0.003), and superior frontal gyrus (p Conclusion Anterior cerebral artery (ACA) atherosclerosis is the most important stroke etiology in our population, causing infarction with various mechanisms. Topographic lesion patterns and consequent clinical features of ACA infarction are determined by diverse pathogenic mechanisms and the status of collateral circulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000314686.94007.d0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Apathy is a well-recognized feature of strokes affecting the medial frontal cortex and the medial and anterior thalamus.

    “In addition, apathy is a well-recognized feature of strokes affecting similar portions of the medial frontal cortex (Kang & Kim, 2008; Le Heron et al., 2018) and the medial and anterior thalamus (Carrera & Bogousslavsky, 2006; Krause et al., 2012; Serra et al., 2013) respectively.”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Kang & Kim, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, S. Y., & Kim, J. S.
Affiliations
Asan Medical Center (KR)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2008-06-10
Volume
70
Issue
24_part_2
Pages
2386-2393
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1968888795
Cited by
177
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Neurological and metabolic disorders
Keywords
anterior cerebral artery infarction, stroke mechanisms, motor impairment, aphasia, grasp reflex, corpus callosum involvement, supplementary motor area, collateral circulation, embolism, MRI lesion localization, clinical-radiological correlation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cerebral Angiography, Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Corpus Callosum, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Korea, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Comorbidity, Causality, Infarction, Anterior Cerebral Artery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review