Cited by 237Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Neuropsychiatric sequelae of stroke

Ferro, José M., Caeiro, Lara, Figueira, Maria Luísa·2016·Nature Reviews Neurology

Abstract

Stroke survivors are often affected by psychological distress and neuropsychiatric disturbances. About one-third of stroke survivors experience depression, anxiety or apathy, which are the most common neuropsychiatric sequelae of stroke. Neuropsychiatric sequelae are disabling, and can have a negative influence on recovery, reduce quality of life and lead to exhaustion of the caregiver. Despite the availability of screening instruments and effective treatments, neuropsychiatric disturbances attributed to stroke are currently underdiagnosed and undertreated. Stroke severity, stroke-related disabilities, cerebral small vessel disease, previous psychiatric disease, poor coping strategies and unfavourable psychosocial environment influence the presence and severity of the psychiatric sequelae of stroke. Although consistent associations between psychiatric disturbances and specific stroke locations have yet to be confirmed, functional MRI studies are beginning to unveil the anatomical networks that are disrupted in stroke-associated psychiatric disorders. Evidence regarding biochemical and genetic biomarkers for stroke-associated psychiatric disorders is still limited, and better understanding of the biological determinants and pathophysiology of these disorders is needed. Investigation into the management of these conditions must be continued, and should include pilot studies to assess the benefits of innovative behavioural interventions and large-scale cooperative randomized controlled pharmacological trials of drugs that are safe to use in patients with stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.46

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These brain pathologies are described as both etiological factors and consequences of psychiatric disorders and neurodegenerative diseases.

    “These brain pathologies are described as both etiological factors and consequences of psychiatric disorders and neurodegenerative diseases [15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferro, J. M., Caeiro, L., & Figueira, M. L.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Ferro, José M.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2016-04-11
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
269-280
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W2318998344
Cited by
237
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
stroke, neuropsychiatric sequelae, depression, anxiety, apathy, stroke survivors, psychological distress, cerebral small vessel disease, stroke location, functional MRI, biomarkers, pathophysiology, screening, quality of life, caregiver burden
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Personality Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Survivors, Stroke, Apathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review