The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 17 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT)
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Our prespecified dose-response analyses of A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) aim to provide practical guidance for clinicians on the timing, frequency, and amount of mobilization following acute stroke. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had confirmed first (or recurrent) stroke, and were admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were randomized to receive very early and frequent mobilization, commencing within 24 hours, or usual care. We used regression analyses and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to investigate the effect of timing and dose of mobilization on efficacy and safety outcomes, irrespective of assigned treatment group. RESULTS: A total of 2,104 patients were enrolled, of whom 2,083 (99.0%) were followed up at 3 months. We found a consistent pattern of improved odds of favorable outcome in efficacy and safety outcomes with increased daily frequency of out-of-bed sessions (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.18, p < 0.001), keeping time to first mobilization and mobilization amount constant. Increased amount (minutes per day) of mobilization reduced the odds of a good outcome (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, p < 0.001). Session frequency was the most important variable in the CART analysis, after prognostic variables age and baseline stroke severity. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that shorter, more frequent mobilization early after acute stroke is associated with greater odds of favorable outcome at 3 months when controlling for age and stroke severity. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that shorter, more frequent early mobilization improves the chance of regaining independence after stroke.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In prespecified dose-response analyses of AVERT (2,104 randomized; 2,083 followed at 3 months), shorter, more frequent out-of-bed mobilization after acute stroke was associated with greater odds of favorable outcome at 3 months, while greater daily minutes of mobilization was associated with lower odds. These exploratory analyses suggest session frequency may be a key driver of outcome, but require confirmation in RCTs.
Key findings
- Increased daily frequency of out-of-bed sessions was associated with improved odds of favorable outcome (mRS 0–2): OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09–1.18, p < 0.001, holding time to first mobilization and mobilization amount constant; it also improved the odds of walking 50 meters unassisted by 66% (95% CI 53–80, p < 0.001).
- Increased daily amount (minutes/day) of mobilization reduced the odds of a good outcome: OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91–0.97, p < 0.001. Greater time to first mobilization was associated with reduced odds of favorable outcome: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–1.00, p = 0.036.
- Increasing session frequency was the only dose characteristic that reduced the odds of death by approximately 20%; nonfatal SAE associations were less consistent, and the relatively few immobility and neurologic SAEs should be viewed with caution.
- In CART, after baseline stroke severity (NIHSS, relative importance 100%), session frequency was next most important (39.2%), then age (32.4%), TTFM (10.5%), and daily amount (2.7%); treatment group was not an important discriminator. In the usual care group alone, more frequent sessions improved the odds of a good outcome by 12% (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04–1.21, p < 0.004).
Methods
- Prespecified dose-response analysis of AVERT, a pragmatic, parallel-group RCT conducted in 56 stroke units in 5 countries; 2,104 patients were randomized to very early mobilization or usual care, and 2,083 (99.0%) were followed at 3 months. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had confirmed first or recurrent stroke, and were admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours of stroke onset.
- Dose measures were time from stroke onset to first mobilization out of bed (TTFM, hours), median number of out-of-bed sessions per patient per day (frequency), median minutes of out-of-bed activity per patient per day (daily amount), and total minutes over the intervention period. Frequency and TTFM were derived from nurse and physiotherapist data; daily and total amount reflected physiotherapy data alone.
- Analyses used binary logistic regression for favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) and walking, Cox regression for time to unassisted walking, logistic regression for death, and negative binomial regression for SAEs, adjusted for age and baseline NIHSS. Two models were tested to avoid collinearity between daily and total amount; CART with 10-fold internal cross-validation explored interactions.
Limitations
- Stated: this exploratory analysis is not an RCT testing each intervention component separately (time, amount, frequency), and results need confirmation in further RCTs.
- Stated: only physiotherapist-assisted out-of-bed therapy time was recorded, not nursing time, so the data underestimate actual minutes per day spent in out-of-bed activity.
- Stated/evident: the optimal time to commence out-of-bed activity remains unknown, partly because TTFM had a compact distribution (median 20.2 hours, IQR 14.7–23.8); SAE analyses had relatively few immobility and neurologic events. Also evident: dose-response associations are observational irrespective of assigned treatment group, so residual confounding is possible, although the authors report a similar frequency association in the usual care group alone.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 17 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Session frequency was the most important variable in the CART analysis, after prognostic variables age and baseline stroke severity.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“The relative contribution of variables to the model showed initial stroke severity (NIHSS), a known predictor of recovery, was most important (100%), followed by session frequency (39.2%), age (32.4%), TTFM (10.5%), and daily amount (2.7%).”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > Abstract > Results:
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increasing the frequency of sessions improved the odds of favorable outcome by 13% (95% CI 9–18 p < 0.001) and improved the odds of walking 50 meters unassisted by 66% (95% CI 53–80, p < 0.001) when TTFM and daily amount were kept constant.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When examining associations with intervention characteristics and death, increasing session frequency was the only characteristic that reduced the odds of death by approximately 20% (table 4).”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found a consistent pattern of improved odds of favorable outcome in efficacy and safety outcomes with increased daily frequency of out-of-bed sessions (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 1.18, p < 0.001), keeping time to first mobilization and mobilization amount constant.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“Increasing the frequency of sessions improved the odds of favorable outcome by 13% (95% CI 9–18 p < 0.001) and improved the odds of walking 50 meters unassisted by 66% (95% CI 53–80, p < 0.001) when TTFM and daily amount were kept constant.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“In particular, we saw 13% improvement in the odds of a favorable outcome with each additional session of out-of-bed activity per day (keeping the time to first mobilization and daily amount constant).”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > Abstract > Results:
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The dose characteristics (TTFM, frequency, daily amount) measured from nurse and physiotherapist records accurately represent the actual mobilization dose received by patients.
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Treatment group was not an important discriminator.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Greater TTFM was associated with a reduced odds of favorable outcome (0.99, 0.98–1.00, p = 0.036; table 3).”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increased amount (minutes per day) of mobilization reduced the odds of a good outcome (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, p < 0.001).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“Keeping TTFM and frequency constant, every extra 5 minutes of out-of-bed activity per day reduced the odds of a favorable outcome.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Conversely, increasing the amount of time spent in out-of-bed activity, keeping the frequency and time to first mobilization constant, reduced the odds of a favorable outcome.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > Abstract > Results:
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The dose characteristics (TTFM, frequency, daily amount) measured from nurse and physiotherapist records accurately represent the actual mobilization dose received by patients.
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, at terminal node 4 (figure 1), patients between 76.3 and 86.1 years, with an NIHSS score >4.5 (but ≤7.5), showed greater probability of a favorable outcome (63.6%) if they received no more than 13.5 minutes per day distributed across frequent (short) sessions.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, in patients with more severe stroke (NIHSS > 13.5), a more favorable outcome was evident in those with more rather than less sessions (figure e-3).”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Frequency again split the tree for terminal nodes 5 and 6, indicating that more frequent sessions to achieve a higher dose (>13.5 minutes per day) was associated with greater odds of a good outcome.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 15
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In CART1 (figure 1), including TTFM, frequency and daily amount, age, NIHSS, stroke subtype, rtPA treatment, and randomization group, we found good to excellent performance, with a training ROC of 0.78 and a testing ROC of 0.77.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to first mobilization was 20.2 hours (14.7–23.8), while 1,588 (75%) participants commenced out-of-bed activity within 24 hours of stroke (table 2).”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Younger patients (≤76.3 years) and those with low NIHSS score (≤7.5) had high probability of a favorable outcome (78.2%).”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TTFM was not significant in any model, but frequency and amount were (table 4).”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TTFM, frequency, amount, and group are all influential splitters in these models.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, less time to first mobilization was also associated with improved odds of a good outcome (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–0.99, p = 0.002), while more minutes of out-of-bed activity was not (table e-1).”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To avoid excessive collinearity between daily amount and total amount, we tested 2 separate models, adjusted for age and baseline stroke severity (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), for all analyses, as follows:”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > METHODS > Statistical analysis.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In AVERT, all interventions were carefully recorded, thus allowing a detailed investigation of dose response.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > Abstract > Classification of evidence:
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Between July 18, 2006, and October 16, 2014, we randomly assigned 2,104 patients to VEM (n = 1,054) and usual care (n = 1,050), with 2,083 (99%) patients followed to the primary 3-month endpoint.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All trial personnel were masked to group, except the intervention monitor.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > METHODS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Greater amounts of physical training poststroke is associated with improved outcomes (without harm) in a number of meta-analyses,5,6 and many guidelines recommend increasing training dose.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > Abstract > Classification of evidence:
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Veerbeek J, van Wegen E, Van Peppen RPS, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e87987. 24505342 PMC3913786 source
- Not checked yetcites [6] Kwakkel G, van Peppen RPS, Wagenaar R, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004; 35: 2529– 2536. 15472114 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Randomization was blocked, balanced by site, and stratified by stroke severity.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > METHODS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These dose-response analyses repeat our major primary and secondary analyses1 with dose characteristics (TTFM, frequency, daily amount, total amount) as independent variables, and were prespecified in our statistical analysis plan.11”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > METHODS > Statistical analysis.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Bernhardt J, Churilov L, Dewey H, et al. Statistical analysis plan (SAP) for a very early rehabilitation trial (AVERT): an international trial to determine the efficacy and safety of commencing out of bed standing and walking training (very early mobilisation) within 24 h of stroke onset vs usual stroke unit care. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 23– 24. 25491547 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“A further animal systematic review showed that early initiated (24–48 hours poststroke) moderate exercise reduced lesion volume and protected perilesional tissue against oxidative damage and inflammation.22”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Austin MW, Ploughman M, Glynn L, Corbett D Aerobic exercise effects on neuroprotection and brain repair following stroke: a systematic review and perspective. Neurosci Res 2014; 87: 8– 15. 24997243 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While early animal studies showed that very-high-dose training within the first days poststroke increased brain lesion volume,20 our recent animal meta-analysis21 found that a shorter interval between stroke and exercise start reduced infarct volume (effect size −0.24, 95% CI −0.36 to −0.06, p < 0.004), without significantly influencing behavioral outcomes.21”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Egan K, Janssen H, Sena E, et al. Exercise reduces infarct volume and facilitates neurobehavioural recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise models in ischaemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014; 28: 800– 812. 24553105 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Definitions for therapy intensity vary, but to date the focus has been on amount (minutes) rather than frequency (repetitions of a task, or sessions per day).16”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Kwakkel G Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 823– 830. 16777769 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The issue of timing, frequency, and amount of therapy is more complex that previously realized.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Recently, Bell et al.14 studied skilled reaching in stroke-affected mice and found that twice daily, higher-dose training accelerated recovery and improved final outcome compared to a once-a-day, lower-dose regimen.”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Bell JA, Wolke ML, Ortez RC, Jones TA, Kerr AL Training intensity affects motor rehabilitation efficacy following unilateral ischemic insult of the sensorimotor cortex in C57BL/6 mice. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 590– 598. 25323461 PMC4400185 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Study strengths include that the dose-response analysis was prespecified11 to help understand our complex intervention, and we had a strong focus on the quality of the nurse and physiotherapy data collected in the trial.11”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Bernhardt J, Churilov L, Dewey H, et al. Statistical analysis plan (SAP) for a very early rehabilitation trial (AVERT): an international trial to determine the efficacy and safety of commencing out of bed standing and walking training (very early mobilisation) within 24 h of stroke onset vs usual stroke unit care. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 23– 24. 25491547 source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, a 3-arm early rehabilitation trial testing upper limb constraint regimens, although small (n = 52), also found that a higher amount of training was inferior to lower-dose usual care.18”
§ Prespecified dose-response analysis for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT) > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeirer RL, et al. Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-centre RCT. Neurology 2009; 73: 195– 201. 19458319 PMC2715572 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
In AVERT, usual care was not standardized and mobilization often commenced within 24 hours of stroke.
“However, a recommendation of “usual care” is of limited value to clinicians seeking guidance, as usual care was not standardized and mobilization often commenced within 24 hours of stroke.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The dose characteristics (TTFM, frequency, daily amount) measured from nurse and physiotherapist records accurately represent the actual mobilization dose received by patients.
“Nurses recorded type of activity and time of the day each activity began, but not minutes, as this was not routine practice. Physiotherapists recorded activity type, time the activity began, and total out-of-bed activity time (minutes), consistent with their routine practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The relationship between dose characteristics and outcome is not confounded by unmeasured factors beyond age and baseline stroke severity.
“To avoid excessive collinearity between daily amount and total amount, we tested 2 separate models, adjusted for age and baseline stroke severity (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), for all analyses, as follows:”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Subsequent analysis of this extensive motor recovery dataset also suggest a complex interaction between the frequency and amount of intervention at this early stage [24]”
From Aphasia Recovery: When, How and Who to Treat? (2018) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
CART importance ranking places frequency ahead of age
MinorThe abstract says session frequency ranked after both age and baseline stroke severity. The reported CART rankings instead place frequency (39.2%) ahead of age (32.4%).
“Session frequency was the most important variable in the CART analysis, after prognostic variables age and baseline stroke severity.”
“The relative contribution of variables to the model showed initial stroke severity (NIHSS), a known predictor of recovery, was most important (100%), followed by session frequency (39.2%), age (32.4%), TTFM (10.5%), and daily amount (2.7%).”
Citations
Cites
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655 · Cited by 10,995
An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R
Sohil, F., Sohali, M. U., & Shabbir, J. (2021) · Statistical Theory and Related Fields · doi:10.1080/24754269.2021.1980261 · Cited by 5,145
An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R
James, G. M., Witten, D., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2018) · doi:10.25334/q4ht55 · Cited by 2,913
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2013) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010 · Cited by 1,658
Billinger, S. A., Arena, R., Bernhardt, J., Eng, J. J., Franklin, B. A., Johnson, C. M., MacKay-Lyons, M., Macko, R. F., Mead, G. E., Roth, E. J., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000022 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationWhat Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 · Cited by 1,203
Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
Kwakkel, G., van Peppen, R., Wagenaar, R. C., Wood Dauphinee, S., Richards, C., Ashburn, A., Miller, K., Lincoln, N., Partridge, C., Wellwood, I., et al. (2004) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000143153.76460.7d · Cited by 1,081
Self-citation(2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60690-0 · Cited by 789
Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke
Todhunter‐Brown, A., Baer, G. D., Campbell, P., Choo, P. L., Förster, A., Morris, J. H., Pomeroy, V. M., & Langhorne, P. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001920.pub3 · Cited by 611
Self-citationGetting Neurorehabilitation Right: What Can Be Learned From Animal Models?
Krakauer, J. W., Carmichael, S. T., Corbett, D., & Wittenberg, G. F. (2012) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968312440745 · Cited by 591
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review
Coleman, E. R., Moudgal, R., Lang, K., Hyacinth, H. I., Awosika, O. O., Kissela, B. M., & Feng, W. (2017) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6 · Cited by 424
Aphasia Recovery: When, How and Who to Treat?
Doogan, C., Dignam, J., Copland, D., & Leff, A. (2018) · Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s11910-018-0891-x · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernhardt, J., Churilov, L., Ellery, F., Collier, J., Chamberlain, J., Langhorne, P., Lindley, R. I., Moodie, M., Dewey, H., Thrift, A. G., Donnan, G., AVERT Collaboration Group, Bernhardt, J., Churilov, L., Collier, J., Dewey, H., Donnan, G., Ellery, F., Langhorne, P., Lindley, R., Moodie, M., Parsons, B., Thrift, A., Donnan, G., Dewey, H., Bernhardt, J., Langhorne, P., Moodie, M., Parsons, B., Investigators MIs, M., Indredavik, B., Askim, T., Bath, P., Bladin, C., Reid, C., Read, S., Said, C., Middleton, S., Frayne, J., Srikanth, V., Bernhardt, A. J., Dewey, H., Bernhardt, J., Donnan, G., Thrift, A., Carter, R., Lindley, R., Bernhardt, J., Donnan, G., Lindley, R., Thrift, A., Langhorne, P., Moodie, M., Dewey, H., Churilov, L., Langhorne, P., Langhorne, P., Wu, O., Bernhardt, J., Claire Ritchie, M. W., Smith, L., Langhorne, P., Wu, O., Ashburn, A., Rodgers, H., Bernhardt, J., Langhorne, P., Ashburn, A., Bernhardt, J., Rogers, H., Wu, O., Lennon, S., Lennon, S., Power, M., Bernhardt, J., Hameed, S., Hameed, S., Pavanni, R., Lim, P., Bernhardt, J., Tan, D., Churilov, L., Brewer, T., Collier, J., Haritos, N., Leong, E., Li, C., NayWin, C., Nicol, M., Olenka, L., Quang, L. C., Moodie, M., Carter, R., Hope, S., Sheppard, L., Teo, K. T., Wu, O., Cumming, T., Linden, T., Borschmann, K., Chamberlain, J., Collier, J., Cumming, T., Ellery, F., Occhiodoro, T., Palfreeman, H., Purvis, T., Sirgo, B., Tiliacos, N., Van Holsteyn, J., Zhao, H., Armstrong, B., Craig, L., Graham, F., Legg, L., Morrison, R., Moorhead, H., O’Donohue, L., Rogers, S., Smith, M., Forshaw, D., Fitzgerald, J., Hibbert, E., Melling, R., Petrolo, S., Purvis, T., Williamson MIs, H., Adams, P., Augoustakis, L., Batcheler, S., Berney, S., Cobani, V, Cohen, B., Dewey, H., Gangi, S., Giofre, N., Gordon, C., Hegarty, L., Hindson, M., Horvath, F., Kalinowski, S., Kleine, A., Kramer, S., Lawrence, J., Lindquist, S., Logan, N., Macdonell, A., Matlioski, J., McDonough, N., McLennan, S., McNamee, M., Miller, L., Nall, C., Nelson, E., Ng, K., Nicholas, Z., Nunn, C., Owen, K., Plant, E., Proud, L., Quah, D., Rodway, K., Sertori, S., Sheldon, V, Sherry, L., Speare, S., Stansfeld, K., Studden, N., Teoh, Z., Twist, L., Velupillai, G., Walker, L., Wall, K., Warwick, A., Wharrie, R., Wilson, J., Worboys, H., Young, D., Ancliffe MI, J., Bryant, M., Doran, B., Field, M., Fogliani, P., Haber, A., Hankey, G., Hendrie, D., Jackaman, V, Jacobsen, A., Jose, S., Lim, R., Louis, R., Nanthakumar, S., Pain, S., Power, A., Rappeport, B., Reynolds, J., Smith, L., Tombe, S., Wesseldine, A., West, T., Clarke, K., Maccanti, H., Marr, L., Plumb, S., Quiney, J., Werner MIs, L., Abeykoon, E., Apirutvorrachod, W., Attard, L., Behanan, S., Brown, D., Buchanan, K., Butler, D., Camac, M., Davis, S., Diocera, D., Gan, N., Gendre, C., Germaine, J., Hand, P., Maurenbrecher, L., McCulloch, J., Mcritchie, S., Ong, M., Pachett, R., Pesavento, L., Power, H., Reilly, R., Sawers, M., Silva, G., Stevens, C., Taylor, L., Timms, T., Ugalde, M., Vardy, A., Wallace, J., Walsh, S., Whatley, E., Winter, E., Baxter, M., Davis, M., Sundararajan MIs, L., Butler, E., Caspers, K., Coulter, E., Shaw, S., Kent, F., Lack, H., Leavold, F., Lord, J., Martin-Francisco, J., Mohanraj, R., Nelson, R., O'Neill, T., Otto, R., Parker, J., Rees, V, Stevens, B., Chen MI, R., Lindley, R., Bindra, J., Dongre, R., Downey, N., Ferris, M., Gibson, L., Gonzalez, R., Kinniburgh, M., Lazaridou, M., McCormack, D., Singh, R., Stepney, A., Tria, Y., Bainbridge, K., Killey, B., Sheedy MIs, R., Aitchison, O., Bray, L., Clatworthy, K., Coghill, S., Collins, M., Cornwall, L., Dow, J., Gates, P., Gillett, S., Johnson, N., Joseph, S., Kopelke, K., Lam, R., Levy, R., Lloyd, N., Logan, S., McPherson, G., Newth, M., Parsons, C., Powles, K., Rebis, M., Samakowidic, T., Sanders, L., Savickas, S., Shrimpton, J., Smith, H., Smith, L., Spehr, J., Summers, J., Taylor, G., Thackeray, M., Wilkinson, B., Richardson MI, K., Frayne, J., Barber, E., Bode, L., Brakey, A., Chand, K., Christin, P., Crook, G., Delrosario-Kelly, D., Descallar, R., Deutsch, A., Easo, S., Farquhar, M., Fergus, P., Ford, J., Hamson, E., Hlaing, M., Hope, E., Lacivita, J., Laurenson, J., Lock, K., Ly, N., McKay, K., Mill, C., Moloney, K., Price, L., Terry, T., Tyers, A., Willems, S., Woolstencroft, R., Crawshaw, N., Luker, J., Wood, C., Choat MIs, S., Archer, C., Benham, D., Billinger, M., Bronca, M., Curchin, S., Dickie, C., Dixon, M., Douglass, D., Enomoto, M., Ernst, K., Fries, L., George, S., Green, E., Hamilton, L., Harris, Z., Heard, T., Hunt, G., Jamieson, N., Mackenzie, M., McKearney, H., Oermann, B., O'Reilly, C., Pearson, T., Reid, N., Rodda, L., Scutcheon, D., Simons, C., Smith, R., Tait, L., Troake, J., Usher, D., Mackey, L., Wijeratne MIs, T., Abela, C., Ashoka, S., Chen, C., Cheng, T., Chong, V, Cooke, S., Fok, A., Galang, L., Grant, C., Karageorge, S., Kat, K., Keo, L., Lee, B., Luscombe, A., Mackay, J., Minett, M., Mizen, J., Nim, P., Nunlist, N., Patel, V, Pathirage, M., Paton, A., Pombuena, M., Rathnayake, N., Rhodes, L., Sequeira, M., Smart, S., Somaratne, S., Maria, N. S., Talbot, L., Tecle, R., Shannon, M., Gerraty MIs, R., Allen, S., Boyle, R., Fatchen, N., Hendley, N., Hyde, A., Inal, M., Kalubowilage, P., Laverde, M., Lawless, K., McFadyen, A., Peters, K., Pugh, C., Qin, C., Robertson, J., Smee, S., Tomlinson, R., Wang, V, Williams, F., Woolley, D., Yawieriin, R., Austin, N., Pomfret, S., Tinsley MIs, M., Allport, L., Ang, C., Armitage, L., Blundell, E., Courtney, A., Dela Costa, M., Thapa, T. D., Diwakar, P., Dulleh, M., Francis, J., Cic, P., Gellie, G., Gill, C., James, D., Lee, S., Mai, T., Majcher, K., Mawson, C., Newton, G., Qiu, N., Ragonton, E., Roberts, L., Saitamis, H., Stanwell, L., Ting, L., Xu, P., Yin, L., Crosby MI, V, Broadhead, K., Church, J., Collins, R., Everitt, K., Fisher, M., Hochmuth, K., Jones, N., Lieschke, A., McCarthy, E., McGlone, C., Morey, D., Neilson, D., Spry, S., Vile, M., Grimley, R., Rowley MIs, D., Rosbergen, I., Ahern, E., Anderson, L., Boreham, J., Devin, R., Doolan, R., Dyke, M., Griffiths, L., Guest, K., Hecita, D., Kendal, N., Koltermann, J., Lacy, M., Lebeter, S., Lloyd, D., Matthews, M., McAuley, C., Pollock, A., Pyke, M., Rogers, T., Street, S., Styles, G., Tampiyappa, A., Trinder, J., Verral, T., Walker, K., White, C., Beckwith, T., Cormack MIs, L., Arriagada, J., Babenschneider, C., Blacker, D., Bennett, S., Connor, S., Cowmeadow, J., Daniel, N., Edmonds, G., Faulkner, M., Garcia-Vega, M., Kruger, K., Martial, B., McGinley, P., Mountford, H., Riley, V, Smith, N., Stepan, F., Tilley, S., Whisson, S., Groot MI, P., Bailey, J., Ballinger, K., Bell, C., Camilleri, B., Charnley, C., Crabbe, D., Crossland, S., Edirimanna, N., Fitzgerald, C., Gibbins, C., Gibbs, J., Hirst, K., Kennedy, A., Klose, E., McDowall, K., Miller, S., Morgan, R., Noonan, A., North, M., Oliver, M., Richards, K., Russell, T., Scott, N., Shlanski, A., Traynor, A., Smith MI, S., Adams, R., Banks, C., Burke, K., Hewat, S., McKenna, B., McKimmie, M., Polmear, L., Traumanis, M., Whiteman, S., Bramah, V, Errey, R., Halpin, M., Molan, V, Wheelwright, D., Wilson, N., Zhang MIs, W., Bakshi, M., Bracher, S., Bryant, M., Byrnes, W., Denton, T., DeVries, N., Fay, P., Galbraith, P., Gallaher, T., Haidar, O., Holgate, K., Hozack, K., Jackson, N., Kipps, S., Lerner, S., Markus, R., Merheb, R., Naismith, C., Nolan, G., Odelli, R., Page, K., Sangvatanakul, P., Simpson, T., van Vliet, P., Walch, K., Walker, S., Yasue, T., Auld MI, G., Baker, R., Cousins, K., Fairbrother, M., Hutchinson, K., Maclean, M., Maher, E., Mills, D., Ohlback, S., Sturm, J., Tooth, M., Watkins, J., Cramb MI, J., Atkinson, P., Conrad, J., Fichera, D., Follent, S., Gilbert, C., Herzig, M., Kohler, S., McCracken, S., Nunan, L., Roberts, S., Shelley, J., Varendorff, S., Wills, A., Moore, A., Robertson MIs, A., Britton, J., Burgess, A., Coates, T., Croft, J., Greening, E., Holland, J., O'Brien, P., Strong, R., Tighe MI, L., Bilston, S., Black, J., De Rivera, K., Dwyer, I., Gissane, S., Heckenberg, K., Jackson, S., Maclagan, A., O'Hare, L., Patel, H., Pearce, J., Scanlan, C., Seymour, K., Symington, M., Tyers, A., Waite, A., Wiesner, K., Katalinic, O., Spear MIs, M., Brown, P., Difuntorum, E., Gilbert, S., Henderson, J., James, D., Janssen, H., Lane, E., Lowndes, S., Smith, D., Thompson, S., Weaver, D., Weston, S., Wright, S., Cox, S., Tse MIs, C., Adrian, J., Doughty, M., Kok, J., McGrath, R., Morris, T., Pickup, A., Ray, E., Richardson, R., Sims, M., Thompson, C., Trinh, K., Walton, N., Whittaker, F., Andersen MI, P., Burrows, J., Dawson, M., Griffiths, D., Harris, G., Kavalieros, P., O'Brien, B., Roberts, K., Watkins, J., Whyatt, C., McRae, A., Wavish MIs, G., Anos, F., Armstrong, J., Au, E., Barber, A., Bates, C., Bertulfo, M., Boggs, A., Burgess, F., Cassels-Brown, K., Chiu, M., Dass, S., Duff, N., Farrell, J., Foster, W., Fuertez, D., Gadhvi, C., George, S., Green, A., Harvey-Fitzgerald, L., Hau, L., Hayward, L., Holman, D., Huggins, K., Jacobs, M., John, A., Kaur, H., Lagerstedt, T., Lee, J., Llenes, R., Lyons, L., Magandi, S., Martin, M., Mathew, S., Mathew, T., McKellar, D., Moss, E., Nand, K., Nicol, K., Peterson, F., Prasad, A., Quick, K., Revell, E., Roy, S., Ryan, J., Samadi, N., Scrivener, B., Slow, J., Tharakan, S., Torrens, J., van Bysterveldt, E., Villaluz, C., Yang, S., Katijjahbe, M., Ai Sing, G., Azlina, A., Azmi, M., Efri, M., Fadilah, A., Fathuddeen, H., Haryani, H., Hussien, H., Izuani, M., Man, Z., Man Ying, C., Mashitoh, K., Noor Azah, A., Norlinah, M., Norliza, I., Ravinder, K., Rohaizah, R., Rosnita, K., Rozita, A., Safwan, J., Sahathevan, R., Shahrul, I., Sharifah, S., Tan, H., Wan Nafisah, W., Yee, Y., Zaharah, M., Zunaidah, A., Tan, D., Ahmad, M., Hameed MIs, S., Bakari, M., Britto, J., Chen, J., Choo, S., Faizal, M., Fong, F., Hong, S., Ja'afar, J., Ke, Z., Koh, G., Lee, C., Lee, Y., Lim, P., Lim, G., Ninhadi, S., Ong, G., Pei, T. P., Penero, V, Rahim, N., Ratnagopal, P., Saleh, K., Seow, H., Sim, E., Tan, C., Tay, P., Teo, I., Thilarajah, S., Wong, P., Wong, W., Yeap, S., Macleod MI, M., Anderson, A., Armstrong, K., Baird, K., Balfour, D., Boyd, M., Cameron, J., Carswell, C., Clanachan, C., Cuthill, L., Devoy, I., Forsyth, S., Gavin, J., Hughes, M., Marr, E., McAuley, S., McCagherty, E., McCallum, K., McDonald, N., McGhee, C., McIntyre, T., Noonan, L., Smart, A., Walshe, R., Neal MI, D., Allison, J., Ball, G., Board, S., Brunt, H., Buckley, C., Carroll, C., Hayward, D., Hutchinson, T., Jones, E., Keeling, E., Marsh, E., Mead, N., Smith, H., Vickers, C., Williams-Yesson, B., Wood, D., Coyle, J., Keeling MIs, M., Ackroyd, L., Brown, C., Donnan, K., Dyer, N., Green, H., Kilbride, G., Nicholson, C., Porteous, M., Louw MI, S., Annamalai, A., Barkat, A., Crawford, S., Fawcett, M., Harvey, D., Hogg, V, Hughes, A., Kemp, J., Morrison, J., Storey, K., Thompson, T., Furnace, J., Macleod MIs, M., Bell, J., Bennett, K., Bruce, M., Clarke, R., Cowie, H., Gow, H., Irvine, J., Joyson, A., MacDonald, S., Macvicar, A., Murphy, N., Robertson, J., Gordon, C., Kwan, J., Redpath, L., Saunders MIs, K., Bell, J., Burrow, R., Clarke, C., Dickson, C., Hann, G., Heath, M., Heath, S., Hewett, A., Humphrey, R., Longland, B., Orpen, A., Ovington, C., Page, J., Rogers, E., Toombs, K., Howes, R., Lacey, A., Meakin MIs, P., Ames, D., Banerjee, S., Beranova, E., Berry, S., Burke, M., Cassama, V, Collins, K., Crow, J., Dunne, A., Gomez, C., Hawkins, A., Hellier, K., Howard, S., Kar, A., Lambert, E., Lee, H., Mandri, C., Moye, J., Murtagh, E., Pushpa-Rajah, J., Richardson, J., TSachs, Stilwell, J., Tilley, V, Wilding, P., Wilson, N., Feely, E., Kirk MIs, S., Cassidy, P., Chalmers, A., Duguid, C., Hughes, N., Hutton, J., Lapsley, K., Lee, J., Murray, A., Weir, L., Whitelaw, M., Barber, M., Esson MIs, D., Armit, H., Devlin, C., Duncan, R., Forman, C., Frame, K., Hogg, L., McLeod, P., McWhinney, R., Porter, J., Purves, M., Snowball, L., Wroath MI, B., Ferson, L., Gibson, M., Gillespie, S., Ignatius, N., Kane, T., Kwant, J., Matthews, M., McCallion, C., McConville, C., McDowell, M., McNally, C., Moore, L., Murphy, P., Nesbitt, A., Newell, J., Power, M., Reid, E., Robinson, K., Charnley, C., James MIs, M., Bacon, S., Booth, N., Bowring, A., Boxall, L., Burt, J., Cageao, J., Green, N., Gupwell, K., Keenan, S., Kingwell, H., Kryszkowska, M., Mortimore, J., Peace, B., Roughan, C., Gunathilagan, G., Sampson, J., Thomas MIs, G., Allen, T., Dane, G., Harris, K., Hart, S., Jones, S., Reader, M., Browne, P., McGoldrick, C., Mullan MIs, D., Adair, P., Armstrong, J., Beggs, E., Bell, I., Edwards, C., Gilligan, L., Kelly, C., Kennedy, M., Kurian, J., Leal, L., McAtamney, A., McKay, E., Rogan, E., Smyth, M., Wiseman, E., Vahidassr, J., Price, C., Riddell MIs, V, Bendix, E., Craig, K., Davison, R., Harrison, A., Smith, A., Green MI, V, Ashton, K., Barkhuizen, W., Daniel, A., Dickinson, C., Durdu, H., Eastwood, D., Goddard, H., Hodkin, R., Howard, J., Jeffs, C., Joyce, S., Kelly, C., Kerr, G., Lanes, J., Magnall, B., McMahon, M., Moody, M., Patton, S., Taylor, R., Watson, A., Mitchelson, K., Mokoena MIs, L., Aird, L., Lakey, R., Murdy, J., Nelson, K., Storey, G., McGeown, R., Tauro MIs, S., Brady, R., Holland, D., Kinnaird, M., Maltman, L., Martin, D., McCord, K., McKenna, S., Morgan, C., Shannon, C., Steele, A., Wiggam, I., Appleby, S., Brotheridge, S., Prescott MIs, M., Bagot, P., Baston, D., Bennett, C., Featherstone, J., Hare, C., McCluskey, A., Wade, S., Worton, R., Hakim, E., Herman, J., Norman MIs, T., Beale, L., Buckley, E., Byrne, K., Gasior, M., Robles, B., Smallwood, C., Stevens, S., Thomas, M., Williams, V, Buck MI, K., Armstrong, S., Brice, V, Edwards, A., Gething, S., Griffiths, A., Hills, T., Howells, D., Langdon, S., Moseley, S., Powell, G., Reynolds, G., Richard, B., Scott, E., White, R., Zebedee, J., Walters MI, M., Alexander, J., Brand, L., Colquhoun, E., Hill, A., Macartney, D., MacDonald, H., Manak, B., Morgan, H., Ritchie, C., Hunter MI, H., Blair, T., Duffy, M., Graham, J., Scott, J., Vu, T., Yorston, P., Nair MI, A., Shakir, I., Button, C., Friend, M., Greig, J., Hairsine, B., Wade, S., Williamson, S., Cloud MI, G., Adedoyin, T., Dayal, N., Gawned, S., Ghatala, R., Jeyaraj, N., Kerin, L., Montague, L., Orefo, C., O'Reilly, J., Styles, J., Trippier, S., Watchurst, C., Watson, F., Hunt, J., Latif MIs, R., Barrett, C., Cox, J., Hammonds, F., Quick, K., Robinson, K., Skinner, A., Vernon, C., Burgess, S., Elder-Gracie MIs, T., Browne, C., Cameron, W., Coleman, V, Fulgencio, C., Gibson, L., Halliday, P., Heaney, D., Main, L., McGavin, K., Mead, G., Proudfoot, F., Redpath, A., Rodger, C., Scott, S., Robinson, K., Mason MI, K., Baxter, L., Bryce, A., Halkett, M., Halliday, J., McAllister, A., McGuiness, M., Munro, M., Robb, A., Thompson, A., Tougher, B., Weadon, J., Young, J., Douglas MI, C., McParland, M., Boyle, S., Byrne, B., Comiskey, L., Gilpin, J., Gilpin, S., Harris, A., Harshaw, S., Haughey, J., McArdle, F., McConnell, L., McEneaney, E., Millar, M., Murphy, M., & Tilley, J.
- Affiliations
- From The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (J.B., L.C., F.E., J. Collier, J. Chamberlain, H.D., G.D.), La Trobe University (J.B.), Melbourne, Australia; Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences (P.L.), University of Glasgow, UK; George Institute for Global Health and Westmead Hospital Clinical School (R.I.L.), University of Sydney; Deakin Health Economics (M.M.), Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood; and Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing...
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- ORCID
- Indredavik, Bent
- Askim, Torunn
- Reid, Christopher
- Read, Stephen
- Middleton, Sandy
- Srikanth, Velandai
- Rodgers, Helen
- Lim, Peter
- Li, Cecilia
- Nicol, Marcus
- Sheppard, Lauren
- Linden, Thomas
- Borschmann, Karen
- Zhao, Henry
- Craig, Louise
- Legg, Lynn
- Forshaw, Denise
- Fitzgerald, Jane
- Berney, S
- McNamee, M
- Nelson, E
- Ng, K
- Worboys, H
- Young, D
- Hankey, G
- Hendrie, D
- Reynolds, J
- Buchanan, K
- Davis, S
- Silva, G
- Taylor, L
- Ugalde, M
- Davis, M
- Butler, E
- Mohanraj, R
- O'Neill, T
- Parker, J
- Bindra, J
- Singh, R
- Gates, P
- Joseph, S
- McPherson, G
- Sanders, L
- Summers, J
- Thackeray, M
- Chand, K
- Easo, S
- Ford, J
- Willems, S
- Woolstencroft, R
- Luker, J
- Heard, T
- Jamieson, N
- Mackey, L
- Lee, B
- Pathirage, M
- Allen, S
- Hendley, N
- McFadyen, A
- Smee, S
- Roberts, L
- Church, J
- Everitt, K
- Lieschke, A
- Grimley, R
- Rosbergen, I
- Doolan, R
- Griffiths, L
- Lacy, M
- Blacker, D
- Connor, S
- Daniel, N
- Bailey, J
- Bell, C
- Kennedy, A
- Noonan, A
- Adams, R
- Burke, K
- Hewat, S
- Wheelwright, D
- Haidar, O
- Holgate, K
- Jackson, N
- Lerner, S
- Markus, R
- Cousins, K
- Hutchinson, K
- Mills, D
- Croft, J
- Dwyer, I
- Gilbert, S
- Janssen, H
- Wright, S
- Doughty, M
- Kok, J
- Trinh, K
- Whittaker, F
- Au, E
- Bates, C
- Bertulfo, M
- Dass, S
- Green, A
- Holman, D
- John, A
- Prasad, A
- Scrivener, B
- Yang, S
- Azmi, MI
- Sahathevan, R
- Hong, S
- Koh, G
- Thilarajah, S
- Cameron, J
- Carswell, C
- Hayward, D
- Jones, E
- Keeling, E
- Mead, N
- Vickers, C
- Nicholson, C
- Clarke, R
- Joyson, A
- Murphy, N
- Kwan, J
- Clarke, C
- Heath, S
- Banerjee, S
- Berry, S
- Crow, J
- Kar, A
- Richardson, J
- Chalmers, A
- Hutton, J
- Murray, A
- Weir, L
- Barber, M
- Forman, C
- Porter, J
- McConville, C
- Bacon, S
- Browne, P
- Price, C
- Bendix, E
- McMahon, M
- Moody, M
- Aird, L
- McCluskey, A
- Stevens, S
- Williams, V
- Hills, T
- Howells, D
- Vu, T
- Jeyaraj, N
- O'Reilly, J
- Trippier, S
- Cox, J
- Heaney, D
- Main, L
- Mead, G
- Redpath, A
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2016-06-07
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2138-2145
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC4898313
- OpenAlex
- W2317679986
- Semantic Scholar
- b4407b66c71a170f617687c13012a525f3d17d11
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 31.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2017-07-03)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Sanofi
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (12/01/16)
- Stroke Association
- Chest Heart and Stroke Scotland (Res08/A114)
- EVER Neuro Pharma
- National Health and Medical Research Council (386201, 1042600, 1041401)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- acute stroke, early mobilization, dose-response relationship, stroke unit, functional outcome, stroke severity
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Brain Ischemia, Disability Evaluation, Early Ambulation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review