The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Should the symptomatic region be included in dissemination in space in MRI criteria for MS?
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether inclusion of lesions in the symptomatic region influences the performance of dissemination in space (DIS) criteria for a diagnosis of clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). METHODS: We studied 30 patients with CIS with brainstem/cerebellar and spinal cord syndromes who had MRI scans at the time of CIS and were followed up for the development of CDMS. We retrospectively applied the McDonald 2010 DIS criteria (excluding all lesions in the symptomatic region) to baseline MRI scans and 2 modified DIS criteria: (1) the inclusion of asymptomatic lesions in the symptomatic region in DIS, and (2) the inclusion of any lesion in the symptomatic region in DIS. The performance of the McDonald 2010 DIS criteria and the 2 modified criteria for the development of CDMS was compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the DIS criteria was, respectively, 73%, 73%, and 73% for the McDonald 2010 criteria, 80%, 73%, and 77% when asymptomatic lesions in the symptomatic region were included, and 87%, 73%, and 80% when any lesion in the symptomatic region was included in DIS. CONCLUSIONS: Including lesions in the symptomatic region in DIS increases the sensitivity of MRI criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis without compromising specificity. These findings may help inform future revisions of the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with CIS, including lesions in the symptomatic region as part of the criteria for DIS does not significantly increase the accuracy for predicting the development of CDMS. The study lacks the precision to detect an important change in accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Based on histopathological studies, cortical lesions and juxtacortical lesions extending into the cortex are known to be typical of MS. 74,75”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria (2018) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some of these recommendations are evidence-based 73,74 and others are based on expert consensus.”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kang, H., Metz, L., Traboulsee, A., Eliasziw, M., Zhao, G., Cheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, D., the Minocycline in CIS Study Group, Traboulsee, A., et al. (2014) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458513501230 · Cited by 25
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.20703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.410130302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1352458511417828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308675 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073247 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1352458510386999 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awm329 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00393-2 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria
Thompson, A. J., Banwell, B. L., Barkhof, F., Carroll, W. M., Coetzee, T., Comi, G., Correale, J., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Freedman, M. S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30470-2 · Cited by 8,167
Self-citationDiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brownlee, W. J., Swanton, J. K., Miszkiel, K. A., Miller, D. H., & Ciccarelli, O.
- Affiliations
- UCL Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2016-08-16
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 680-683
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC4999167
- OpenAlex
- W2472467404
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0508-10058)
- Multiple Sclerosis Society
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Keywords
- dissemination in space, clinically isolated syndrome, multiple sclerosis diagnosis, asymptomatic lesions, McDonald criteria, diagnostic accuracy, spinal cord syndromes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Stem, Cerebellum, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spinal Cord, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review