The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Direct cortical stimulation of human posteromedial cortex
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The posteromedial cortex (PMC) is a collective term for an anatomically heterogeneous area of the brain constituting a core node of the human default mode network (DMN), which is engaged during internally focused subjective cognition such as autobiographical memory. METHODS: We explored the effects of causal perturbations of PMC with direct electric brain stimulation (EBS) during presurgical epilepsy monitoring with intracranial EEG electrodes. RESULTS: Data were collected from 885 stimulations in 25 patients implanted with intracranial electrodes across the PMC. While EBS of regions immediately dorsal or ventral to the PMC reliably produced somatomotor or visual effects, respectively, we found no observable behavioral or subjectively reported effects when sites within the boundaries of PMC were electrically perturbed. In each patient, null effects of PMC stimulation were observed for sites in which intracranial recordings had clearly demonstrated electrophysiologic responses during autobiographical recall. CONCLUSIONS: Direct electric modulation of the human PMC produced null effects when standard functional mapping methods were used. More sophisticated stimulation paradigms (e.g., EBS during experimental cognitive tests) will be required for testing the causal contribution of PMC to human cognition and subjective experience. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that some extant theories of PMC and DMN contribution to human awareness and subjective conscious states require cautious re-examination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PFC is not the only region of the brain where iES-elicited effects are rare: other high-level association areas also appear to share this property, and these trends appear to be driven by the brain's intrinsic network architecture.
“It is also significant that the PFC is not the only region of the brain where iES-elicited effects are rare: other high-level association areas also appear to share this property (e.g., the posterior cingulate cortex) (Foster and Parvizi, 2017), and these trends appear to be driven by the brain's intrinsic network architecture (Fox et al., 2020).”
From Does the Prefrontal Cortex Play an Essential Role in Consciousness? Insights from Intracranial Electrical Stimulation of the Human Brain (2021) · cites this paper as Foster and Parvizi, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 50
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1073/pnas.0507729103 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35094500 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.041 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2625-04.2004 · DOI
- 10.1196/annals.1440.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1149213 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50017-7 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3769-11.2012 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2000.00214.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp.67.1.121 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00852-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1196/annals.1417.015 · DOI
- 10.1097/AIA.0b013e318181a8b3 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1017098108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1206580109 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.019 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0513-13.2013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.005 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00909 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.020 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awv381 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awv187 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhu256 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305604 · DOI
- Ojemann GA. Functional mapping of cortical language areas in adults: intraoperative approaches. Adv Neurol 1993;63:155–163.
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002525 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002533 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0021798 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0527-14.2014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.037 · DOI
- 10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/046018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.070 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, B. L., & Parvizi, J.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2017-02-14
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 685-691
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- PMC
- PMC5317378
- OpenAlex
- W2574171202
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (4r01ns078396-05)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R00MH103479)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS078396)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- posteromedial cortex, default mode network, intracranial EEG, epilepsy surgery, autobiographical memory, subjective consciousness, visual effects, functional brain mapping
- MeSH terms
- Drug Resistant Epilepsy, Electrocorticography, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Consciousness, Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Motor Activity, Visual Perception, Touch Perception, Preoperative Period, Neurophysiological Monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review