Cited by 36Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Cognitive decline after elective and nonelective hospitalizations in older adults

Open access
James, Bryan D., Wilson, Robert S., Capuano, Ana W., Boyle, Patricia A., Shah, Raj C., Lamar, Melissa, Ely, E. Wesley, Bennett, David A. +1 more·2019·Neurology

Abstract

Objective To determine whether emergent and urgent (nonelective) hospitalizations are associated with faster acceleration of cognitive decline compared to elective hospitalizations, accounting for prehospital decline. Methods Data came from the Rush Memory and Aging Project, a prospective cohort study of community-dwelling older persons without baseline dementia. Annual measures of cognition via a battery of 19 tests were linked to 1999 to 2010 Medicare claims records. Results Of 777 participants, 460 (59.2%) were hospitalized over a mean of 5.0 (SD = 2.6) years; 222 (28.6%) had at least one elective and 418 (53.8%) at least one nonelective hospitalization. Mixed-effects regression models estimated change in global cognition before and after each type of hospitalization compared to no hospitalization, adjusted for age, sex, education, medical conditions, length of stay, surgery, intensive care unit, and comorbidities. Persons who were not hospitalized had a mean loss of 0.051 unit global cognition per year. In comparison, there was no significant difference in rate of decline before (0.044 unit per year) or after (0.048 unit per year) elective hospitalizations. In contrast, decline before nonelective hospitalization was faster (0.076 unit per year; estimate = −0.024, SE = 0.011, p = 0.032), and accelerated by 0.036 unit (SE = 0.005, p < 0.001) to mean loss of 0.112 unit per year after nonelective hospitalizations, more than doubling the rate in those not hospitalized. Conclusions Nonelective hospitalizations are related to more dramatic acceleration in cognitive decline compared to elective hospitalizations, even after accounting for prehospital decline. These findings may inform which hospital admissions pose the greatest risk to the cognitive health of older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006918

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A growing body of evidence suggests that critical illness and medical encounters such as hospitalization in older people increase their risk of long-term cognitive impairment and dementia.

    “A growing body of evidence suggests that critical illness and medical encounters such as hospitalization in older people increase their risk of long‐term cognitive impairment and dementia.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [224]

  • High-quality care for people with dementia takes longer than caring for others with the same condition.

    “High-quality care for people with dementia takes longer than caring for others with the same condition.278”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [278]

    The Participants section says people with dementia were removed from the analytic sample, and the Discussion addresses cognitive decline after hospitalization. Neither addresses how long high-quality care takes for people with dementia compared with others with the same condition. Searches for the claim’s wording and for comparative care time found no supporting passage; page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
James, B. D., Wilson, R. S., Capuano, A. W., Boyle, P. A., Shah, R. C., Lamar, M., Ely, E. W., Bennett, D. A., & Schneider, J. A.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2019-02-12
Volume
92
Issue
7
Pages
e690-e699
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2910456407
Cited by
36
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, K01AG050823, P30AG010161, R01AG033678, R01AG034374)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
cognitive decline, elective hospitalization, emergency admissions, older adults, global cognition, Medicare claims data
MeSH terms
Mental Status and Dementia Tests, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergencies, Female, Medicare, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, United States, Cohort Studies, Independent Living, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review