Cited by 355Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

Early and late life cognitive activity and cognitive systems in old age

WILSON, ROBERT S., BARNES, LISA L., KRUEGER, KRISTIN R., HOGANSON, GEORGE, BIENIAS, JULIA L., BENNETT, DAVID A.·2005·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Little is known about the relative benefits of cognitively stimulating activities at different points in the lifespan. In a cohort of 576 older persons without dementia, we assessed current and past (childhood, young adulthood, middle age) frequency of cognitive activity; availability of cognitively stimulating resources in the home in childhood and middle age; and 5 domains of cognitive function. Past cognitive activity and cognitive resources were positively correlated with both current cognitive activity and current cognitive function. The association with cognitive function was reduced after controlling for current cognitive activity, however. Current cognitive activity was associated with better cognitive function, especially semantic memory and perceptual speed, even after controlling for past activity. The results suggest that past cognitive activity contributes to current cognition principally through its association with cognitive activity in old age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617705050459

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retrospective estimates of early-life cognitive activity and indicators of early-life socioeconomic status are positively correlated with late-life level of cognitive activity, but the associations are far from perfect.

    “retrospective estimates of early-life cognitive activity and indicators of early-life socioeconomic status are positively correlated with late-life level of cognitive activity, but the associations are far from perfect (Wilson, Barnes, Krueger, et al., 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WILSON, R. S., BARNES, L. L., KRUEGER, K. R., HOGANSON, G., BIENIAS, J. L., & BENNETT, D. A.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2005-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
400-407
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W1931372835
Cited by
355
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 22
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, R01‐AG17917)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive activity, cognitive stimulation, lifespan, older adults, cognitive function, semantic memory, perceptual speed, cognitive aging, dementia-free older adults
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Perception, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Geriatric Assessment, Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review