Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Amitriptyline versus placebo in postherpetic neuralgia

Watson, C. Peter, Evans, Ramon J., Reed, Kenneth, Merskey, Harold, Goldsmith, Leonard, Warsh, Jerry·1982·Neurology

Abstract

To study the effects of amitriptyline in treating postherpetic neuralgia, 24 patients were randomly assigned to either drug or placebo in a double-blind crossover study. We found good to excellent pain relief in 16 of 24 patients (p less than or equal to 0.001). We did not find an antidepressant effect in most patients (p greater than 0.05). The median dose of amitriptyline was 75 mg. The median blood level was 65 ng per milliliter, and of nortriptyline 30 ng per milliliter. Good responses were maintained in 12 of 22 patients. Amitriptyline is useful in treating postherpetic neuralgia and may not act as an antidepressant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.32.6.671

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Watson, C. P., Evans, R. J., Reed, K., Merskey, H., Goldsmith, L., & Warsh, J.
Venue
Neurology
Published
1982-06
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
671-671
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2150883260
Cited by
559
References
0
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.