The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk for neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease and residual aluminum in municipal drinking water employing weighted residential histories
Abstract
We investigated a possible relation between aluminum concentration ([Al]) in public drinking water and Alzheimer's disease (AD), with AD cases and controls defined on the basis of strict neuropathologic criteria. Using the case/control odds ratio as an estimate of relative risk and [Al] > or = 100 microgram/L as the cutoff point, elevated risks for histopathologically verified AD were associated with higher [Al]. Comparing all AD cases with all non-AD controls, and using the [Al] of public drinking water at last residence before death as the measure of exposure, the estimated relative risk associated with [Al] > or = 100 microgram/L was 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2-2.5). Estimating aluminum exposure from a 10-year weighted residential history resulted in estimates of relative risk of 2.5 or greater. The public health implications of the observed relationship between [Al] in drinking water and AD prevalence in the population depend in large measure on population exposure characteristics. In Ontario, it is estimated that 19% of the population was exposed to residual [Al] greater than or equal to 100 microgram/L. Based on the estimated relative risk and the assumption of causality, this translates to an etiologic fraction of 0.23. Although the potential contributions of confounding and mitigating factors are not defined in this report, the merit of limiting residual aluminum in drinking water supplies deserves serious attention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grantham-McGregor, S. M., Powell, C. A., Walker, S. P., & Himes, J. H. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90001-6 · Cited by 685
Cited by
Human Health Risk Assessment for Aluminium, Aluminium Oxide, and Aluminium Hydroxide
Krewski, D., Yokel, R. A., Nieboer, E., Borchelt, D., Cohen, J., Harry, J., Kacew, S., Lindsay, J., Mahfouz, A. M., & Rondeau, V. (2007) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937400701597766 · Cited by 998
Aluminium as a risk factor in Alzheimer’s disease, with emphasis on drinking water
Flaten, T. P. (2001) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00459-2 · Cited by 939
Molecular mechanisms of fluoride toxicity
Barbier, O., Arreola-Mendoza, L., & Del Razo, L. M. (2010) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2010.07.011 · Cited by 878
Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Overview of Environmental Risk Factors
Brown, R. C., Lockwood, A. H., & Sonawane, B. R. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7567 · Cited by 512
Kawahara, M., & Kato-Negishi, M. (2011) · International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.4061/2011/276393 · Cited by 509
Metadata
- Authors
- McLachlan, D. R. C., Bergeron, C., Smith, J. E., Boomer, D., & Rifat, S. L.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 401-405
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2003944592
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk for neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease and residual aluminum in municipal drinking water employing weighted residential histories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.46.2.401
- The paper
- McLachlan, D. R. C., Bergeron, C., Smith, J. E., Boomer, D., & Rifat, S. L. (1996). Risk for neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease and residual aluminum in municipal drinking water employing weighted residential histories. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.46.2.401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.