Cited by 152Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Accelerated decline in apolipoprotein E-ϵ4 homozygotes with Alzheimer's disease

Craft, S., Teri, L., Edland, S. D., Kukull, W. A., Schellenberg, G., McCormick, W. C., Bowen, J. D., Larson, E. B.·1998·Neurology

Abstract

Background The apolipoprotein E-epsilon4 (APOE-epsilon4) allele is a powerful genetic risk factor for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). AD patients who are APOE-epsilon4 homozygotes have an earlier age at onset, increased amyloid burden, and decreased acetylcholine levels--findings that suggest differences in disease severity or rate of progression. Studies of genotype differences in rate of decline, however, have produced negative results that may be due to methodologic biases. The current study examined rate of decline in the largest sample of APOE-genotyped AD patients for whom longitudinal cognitive data have been reported. Methods Newly diagnosed patients with probable AD (n = 201) comprised four genotype groups: epsilon2/3 (n = 14), epsilon3/3 (n = 75), epsilon3/4 (n = 82), and epsilon4/4 (n = 30). The Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) was administered at baseline and then annually for 1 to 6 years (mean, 2.5 years). For each subject, a DRS slope was calculated reflecting annual rate of decline. Rate of decline as measured by DRS slope differed according to genotype, with the effect modified by DRS score (p Conclusions APOE-epsilon4 homozygosity is associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline, whereas the epsilon2 allele slows disease progression. These findings suggest that APOE plays a mechanistic role in the progression of AD, and is not simply related to disease onset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.51.1.149

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craft, S., Teri, L., Edland, S. D., Kukull, W. A., Schellenberg, G., McCormick, W. C., Bowen, J. D., & Larson, E. B.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1998-07
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
149-153
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1995006422
Cited by
152
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U01AG006781, R01AG05136, R01AG010880)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
APOE ε4, APOE genotype, Alzheimer's disease, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, disease progression, genetic risk factors, APOE ε2, APOE ε3, longitudinal cognitive assessment, amyloid burden, age of onset
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Genotype, Homozygote, Humans, Male, Age of Onset, Disease Progression, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review