Cited by 177Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

APOE ε2 is associated with milder clinical and pathological A lzheimer disease

Open access
Serrano‐Pozo, Alberto, Qian, Jing, Monsell, Sarah E., Betensky, Rebecca A., Hyman, Bradley T.·2015·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: The Alzheimer disease (AD) APOE ε4 risk allele associates with an earlier age at onset and increased amyloid‐β deposition, whereas the protective APOE ε2 allele delays the onset and appears to prevent amyloid‐β deposition. Yet the clinical and pathological effects of APOE ε2 remain uncertain because of its relative rarity. We investigated the effects of APOE ε2 and ε4 alleles on AD pathology and cognition in a large US data set of well‐characterized AD patients. Methods: We studied individuals from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center autopsy cohort across the entire clinicopathological continuum of AD. Multivariate models were built to examine the associations between APOE alleles and AD neuropathological changes, using the APOE ε3/ε3 group as comparator. Mediation analysis was used to estimate the direct and indirect effects of APOE alleles on AD pathology and cognition (Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes and Mini‐Mental State Examination). Results: Compared to APOE ε3/ε3, APOE ε2 is independently associated with lower Braak neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) stages and possibly fewer neuritic plaques, but has no direct effect on cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) severity, whereas APOE ε4 is associated with more neuritic plaques and CAA, but has no independent effect on Braak NFT stage. Unadjusted analyses showed marked differences among APOE genotypes with respect to cognitive performance (ε2 > ε3 > ε4). Mediation analysis suggests that this is largely explained through effects on pathology. Interpretation: Even when adjusted for age at onset, symptom duration, and other demographic variables, APOE ε2 is associated with milder AD pathology and less severe antemortem cognitive impairment compared to APOE ε3 and ε4 alleles, suggesting a relative neuroprotective effect of APOE ε2 in AD. Ann Neurol 2015;77:917–929

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24369

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative to the APOEε3 homozygote reference group, carrying one or two APOEε4 alleles is independently associated with a higher Aβ plaque burden and more severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy, whereas APOEε2/ε2 and ε2/ε3 individuals have fewer Aβ plaques but are more likely to have cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

    “Relative to the APOEε3 homozygote reference group, carrying one or two APOEε4 alleles is independently associated with a higher Aβ plaque burden and more severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), whereas APOEε2/ε2 and ε2/ε3 individuals have fewer Aβ plaques46–50 but are more likely to have CAA51.”

    From Multifaceted roles of APOE in Alzheimer disease (2024) · cites this paper as [48]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Homozygous APOE4 individuals have a 6 to 18-fold increase in AD risk compared to APOE2/3 individuals.

    “Homozygous APOE4 individuals have a 6 to 18-fold increase in AD risk compared to APOE2/3 individuals [9, 10].”

    From APOE Christchurch enhances a disease-associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathology (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction reports that carrying two APOE ε4 alleles increases lifetime AD risk 8–12 times compared with the ε3 allele. It does not give the claimed 6–18-fold range or use APOE ε2/ε3 individuals as the comparator; it separately says ε2 reduces risk relative to ε3. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study supports known effects of APOE genotypes on standard measures of neuritic Aβ plaque and tau tangle severity.

    “The study supports known effects of APOE genotypes on standard measures of neuritic Aβ plaque and tau tangle severity13”
  • APOE4 is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    “Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD).”
  • Most studies agree that the APOEε4-linked effect on tau neurofibrillary tangles is primarily indirect, mediated through its increase of Aβ plaque burden.

    “In contrast to Aβ pathology, the existence of a direct effect of APOE genotype on the severity of tau neurofibrillary tangle pathology remains controversial, with most studies agreeing that APOEε4-linked effect on tangles is primarily indirect, mediated through its increase of Aβ plaque burden46–48,53.”

    From Multifaceted roles of APOE in Alzheimer disease (2024) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serrano‐Pozo, A., Qian, J., Monsell, S. E., Betensky, R. A., & Hyman, B. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Hyman, Bradley T.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-27
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
917-929
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1958554455
Cited by
176
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (P50 AG005134)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε2, APOE ε4, APOE ε3, risk alleles, neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic plaques, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, amyloid-beta deposition, cognitive impairment, neuropathology, neuroprotection, age of onset
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein E2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review