Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 574

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Practice parameter: The care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

Open access
Miller, R.G., Rosenberg, J.A., Gelinas, D.F., Mitsumoto, H., Newman, D., Sufit, R., Borasio, G.D., Bradley, W.G., Bromberg, M.B., Brooks, B.R., Kasarskis, E.J., Munsat, T.L., Oppenheimer, E.A., the ALS Practice Parameters Task Force·1999·Neurology

Abstract

The Quality Standards Subcommittee (QSS) of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) is charged with developing practice parameters for physicians.This evidence-based review addresses some of the major management issues in patients with ALS, and highlights the many areas in which more research is needed.Justification.ALS is a progressive, degenerative motor neuron disease of unknown cause.Muscle atrophy and spasticity in limb and bulbar muscles result in weakness and loss of ambulation, oropharyngeal dysfunction, weight loss, and ultimately respiratory failure.Although advances in understanding the pathophysiology of ALS have stimulated the development of new drug therapies, 1 the mainstay of treatment for ALS patients remains symptomatic management.The practice parameters presented here comprise the first recommendations for the management of ALS based on a prescribed review and analysis of the peer-reviewed literature.These practice parameters were developed to improve the care and the quality of life of people with ALS by providing a rational basis for managing the disease.Description of the process.A multidisciplinary task force, all with extensive ALS experience, included 19 physicians, 3 patients with ALS, 1 gas-*The investigators and institutions of the ALS Practice Parameters Task Force are listed in the Appendix on page 1320.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.52.7.1311

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 574

Metadata

Authors
Miller, R. G., Rosenberg, J. A., Gelinas, D. F., Mitsumoto, H., Newman, D., Sufit, R., Borasio, G. D., Bradley, W. G., Bromberg, M. B., Brooks, B. R., Kasarskis, E. J., Munsat, T. L., Oppenheimer, E. A., & the ALS Practice Parameters Task Force
Venue
Neurology
Published
1999-04
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
1311-1311
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2140860447
Cited by
574
References
3
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practice parameter: The care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.52.7.1311
The paper
Miller, R. G., Rosenberg, J. A., Gelinas, D. F., Mitsumoto, H., Newman, D., Sufit, R., Borasio, G. D., Bradley, W. G., Bromberg, M. B., Brooks, B. R., Kasarskis, E. J., Munsat, T. L., Oppenheimer, E. A., & the ALS Practice Parameters Task Force. (1999). Practice parameter: The care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.52.7.1311

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.