The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are menstrual cycle-related effects on cortical excitability in normal women. BACKGROUND: Ovarian steroid hormones affect neurotransmission in the brain. Data from animal experiments have shown that progesterone metabolites enhance the action of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the cortex, producing benzodiazepine-like (e.g., diazepam and lorazepam) physiologic and behavioral effects. Estradiol has excitatory effects on measures of neuronal excitability, possibly acting through the glutamate system. These effects have been difficult to detect in women using conventional techniques. However, recently, paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to detect the effects of GABAergic and glutamatergic drugs in humans. We used this method to measure the effects of the menstrual cycle in normal women. METHODS: We tested 13 healthy women during the follicular (low-progesterone) and luteal (high-progesterone) phases of the menstrual cycle using paired TMS. The effect of a subthreshold conditioning pulse on the cortex was tested by measuring the response to a second suprathreshold test pulse and comparing it with the response elicited by the test pulse administered alone. RESULTS: Conditioning TMS produced more inhibition in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase (p = 0.01), of similar magnitude to the reported effect of benzodiazepine drugs. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first direct evidence of changes in the excitability of a cortical network with the menstrual cycle. The results also show a potential confound for studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation in populations that include menstruating women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
AlaSOPro mutation in the gene encoding α-synuclein in Parkinson's disease
Krüger, R., Kuhn, W., Müller, T., Woitalla, D., Graeber, M., Kösel, S., Przuntek, H., Epplen, J. T., Schols, L., & Riess, O. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0298-106 · Cited by 3,836
Mapping of a gene for Parkinson's disease to chromosome 4q21-q23
Polymeropoulos, M. H., Higgins, J. J., Golbe, L. I., Johnson, W. G., Ide, S. E., Di Iorio, G., Sanges, G., Stenroos, E. S., Pho, L. T., Schaffer, A. A., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5290.1197 · Cited by 788
Schmidt, P. J., Nieman, L. K., Danaceau, M. A., Adams, L. F., & Rubinow, D. R. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801223380401 · Cited by 765
Self-citationGABAA receptor α4 subunit suppression prevents withdrawal properties of an endogenous steroid
Smith, S. S., Gong, Q. H., Hsu, F.-C., Markowitz, R. S., ffrench-Mullen, J. M. H., & Li, X. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31948 · Cited by 564
The glutamate antagonist Riluzole suppresses intracortical facilitation
Liepert, J., Schwenkreis, P., Tegenthoff, M., & Malin, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/bf01294721 · Cited by 274
Cited by
Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016 · Cited by 5,367
Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population
Wassermann, E. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00144-x · Cited by 462
Self-citationPaulus, W., Classen, J., Cohen, L. G., Large, C. H., Di Lazzaro, V., Nitsche, M., Pascual-Leone, A., Rosenow, F., Rothwell, J. C., & Ziemann, U. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.002 · Cited by 414
Krause, B., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00025 · Cited by 339
Motor control and neural plasticity through interhemispheric interactions
Takeuchi, N., Oouchida, Y., & Izumi, S.-I. (2012) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2012/823285 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, M. J., Keel, J. C., Greenberg, B. D., Adams, L. F., Schmidt, P. J., Rubinow, D. A., & Wassermann, E. M.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2069-2069
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1995550210
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.9.2069
- The paper
- Smith, M. J., Keel, J. C., Greenberg, B. D., Adams, L. F., Schmidt, P. J., Rubinow, D. A., & Wassermann, E. M. (1999). Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.9.2069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.