Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of APOE genotype and promoter polymorphism on risk of Alzheimer’s disease

Wang, J.C., Kwon, J.M., Shah, P., Morris, J.C., Goate, A.·2000·Neurology

Abstract

Objective To verify the association between APOE gene promoter polymorphisms and the development of AD and to determine whether the effect of promoter polymorphisms on AD is independent of the APOE epsilon4 allele. Background Three polymorphisms in the APOE promoter have been shown to modify APOE expression in vitro. Several studies have suggested that these polymorphisms may also modulate risk for AD, either independently or by modifying the effect of the APOE coding polymorphism. Methods The authors analyzed allele and genotype distributions for APOE and all three known APOE promoter polymorphisms (-491 A/T, -427 T/C, and -219 G/T) in a study group consisting of 237 subjects with AD and 274 age-matched controls. They then used log-linear and logistic regression analyses to test for possible interactions between APOE genotype and the promoter polymorphisms on risk of AD. Conclusion A strong association between the APOE epsilon 4 allele and AD was detected regardless of promoter polymorphism status. In addition, the -491 AA genotype appears to be an independent genetic risk factor for AD. The -427 T/C polymorphism and the -219 T/G polymorphism were not directly associated with AD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.55.11.1644

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1126/science.8346443 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1146/annurev.med.47.1.387 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550160069041 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1212/WNL.43.8.1467 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1977 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1212/WNL.44.2.342 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/hmg/3.4.569 · DOI
  8. 10.1212/WNL.44.8.1513 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/hmg/7.3.533 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/hmg/7.12.1887 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/hmg/7.9.1511 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/ng0198-69 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00567-9 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00857-X · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00470-4 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s004150050461 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00468-1 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00662-X · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00602-3 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/ana.410240105 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1212/WNL.46.3.707 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1001/archneur.55.3.326 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)43176-1 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1097/00001756-199903170-00038 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.050004797 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00855-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 49

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J. C., Kwon, J. M., Shah, P., Morris, J. C., & Goate, A.
Affiliations
From the Departments of Psychiatry (Drs. Wang and Goate), Neurology (Drs. Kwon and Morris), Biology (P. Shah), and Genetics (Dr. Goate), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2000-12-12
Volume
55
Issue
11
Pages
1644-1649
ISSN
  • 0028-3878
  • 1526-632X
Cited by
49
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review