Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association between clinical disease activity and Epstein–Barr virus reactivation in MS

Wandinger, K.-P., Jabs, W., Siekhaus, A., Bubel, S., Trillenberg, P., Wagner, H.-J., Wessel, K., Kirchner, H., Hennig, H.·2000·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential significance of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation in disease activity in MS patients. METHODS: The prevalence of antibodies against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, EBV, and cytomegalovirus was determined in a group of 108 MS patients and in 163 healthy control subjects. Sera were analyzed using combinations of novel assay systems employing highly purified viral and recombinant antigens. In addition, PCR for the detection of EBV DNA was performed in serial samples. RESULTS: In contrast to the control populations, antibodies against EBV were present in 100% of MS patients. Among the tested human herpesviruses, this high extent of seropositivity was only found for EBV. Primary infection was found exclusively in the control group (3.7%), whereas serologic evidence of EBV reactivation was seen in MS patients (13. 9%) as well as control subjects (17.2%). There was no temporal coincidence between EBV reactivation and disease activity in MS patients. However, in 19 patients followed monthly for 1 year, active viral replication as measured by increased immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgA responses to EBV early antigens (p54 + p138) and positive serum DNA was seen in 72.7% of patients with exacerbations during the study period and in none of the patients with clinically stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate an association between EBV reactivation and disease activity in MS patients over time, and suggest that EBV might play an indirect role in MS as an activator of the underlying disease process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.55.2.178

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Wandinger, K.-P., Jabs, W., Siekhaus, A., Bubel, S., Trillenberg, P., Wagner, H.-J., Wessel, K., Kirchner, H., & Hennig, H.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2000-07-25
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
178-184
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1993741037
Cited by
302
References
2
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between clinical disease activity and Epstein–Barr virus reactivation in MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.55.2.178
The paper
Wandinger, K.-P., Jabs, W., Siekhaus, A., Bubel, S., Trillenberg, P., Wagner, H.-J., Wessel, K., Kirchner, H., & Hennig, H. (2000). Association between clinical disease activity and Epstein–Barr virus reactivation in MS. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.55.2.178

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.