The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fatigue and declines in cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cognitive fatigue, defined as a decline in cognitive performance over a single testing session, could be identified in MS. METHODS: Forty-five individuals with MS and 14 healthy control participants completed a 4-hour session of cognitive testing that involved a baseline neuropsychological battery, a continuous effortful cognitive task (completing mental arithmetic problems administered on a computer), and a repeat neuropsychological battery. Self-report measures of fatigue and affect were completed before each step of the testing session. RESULTS: The pattern of change in cognitive performances over the testing session significantly differed between the MS and control participants. Individuals with MS showed declines on measures of verbal memory and conceptual planning, whereas the control participants showed improvement. Although there were no significant differences between the groups on any of the baseline cognitive measures, the MS participants performed worse than the control subjects on tests of visual memory, verbal memory, and verbal fluency that were repeated following the continuous effortful cognitive task. Both MS and control participants reported increased mental and physical fatigue across the testing session compared with their baseline values. CONCLUSION: Individuals with MS show declines in cognitive performance during a single testing session and fail to show the improvement exemplified by healthy control subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.: II. Impact on employment and social functioning
Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Ellington, L., Nauertz, T., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.5.692 · Cited by 890
Cited by
Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis
Chiaravalloti, N. D., & DeLuca, J. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70259-x · Cited by 2,088
Fatigue in neurological disorders
Chaudhuri, A., & Behan, P. O. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15794-2 · Cited by 1,297
Fatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses: Proposal for a unified taxonomy
Kluger, B. M., Krupp, L. B., & Enoka, R. M. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31827f07be · Cited by 1,036
Self-citationRandomized controlled trial of yoga and exercise in multiple sclerosis
Oken, B. S., Kishiyama, S., Zajdel, D., Bourdette, D., Carlsen, J., Haas, M., Hugos, C., Kraemer, D. F., Lawrence, J., & Mass, M. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000129534.88602.5c · Cited by 593
Cognition in multiple sclerosis
Langdon, D. W. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e328346a43b · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Krupp, L. B., & Elkins, L. E.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2000-10-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 934-939
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1976470756
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fatigue and declines in cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.55.7.934
- The paper
- Krupp, L. B., & Elkins, L. E. (2000). Fatigue and declines in cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.55.7.934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.