Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognition in multiple sclerosis

Langdon, Dawn W·2011·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A broad overview of cognition in multiple sclerosis (MS) is provided, taking account of its impact on the lives of patients, how cognitive impairment relates to disease and magnetic resonance variables, which cognitive domains are most vulnerable, the influence of depression and fatigue and what treatment options are available. RECENT FINDINGS: The current focus is on cognitive reserve, which seems to offer some protection from the cognitive impact of MS. There is also considerable momentum with new MRI techniques and growing interest in PET studies. SUMMARY: Cognition in MS is a priority for patients. Although understanding of the natural history of MS cognitive deficits is reasonably well understood, treatment options require further work before precise recommendations can be made on an individual basis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0b013e328346a43b

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Langdon, D. W.
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2011-06
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
244-249
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074911228
Cited by
403
References
82
FWCI
15.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognition in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/wco.0b013e328346a43b
The paper
Langdon, D. W. (2011). Cognition in multiple sclerosis. Current Opinion in Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1097/wco.0b013e328346a43b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.