Cited by 312Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesCoenzyme Q10 studies and effectsNeurological diseases and metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of coenzyme Q 10 and remacemide in Huntington’s disease

The Huntington Study Group·2001·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether chronic treatment with coenzyme Q10 or remacemide hydrochloride slows the functional decline of early Huntington's disease (HD). METHODS: The authors conducted a multicenter, parallel group, double-blind, 2 x 2 factorial, randomized clinical trial. Research participants with early HD (n = 347) were randomized to receive coenzyme Q10 300 mg twice daily, remacemide hydrochloride 200 mg three times daily, both, or neither treatment, and were evaluated every 4 to 5 months for a total of 30 months on assigned treatment. The prespecified primary measure of efficacy was the change in total functional capacity (TFC) between baseline and 30 months. Safety measures included the frequency of clinical adverse events. RESULTS: Neither intervention significantly altered the decline in TFC. Patients treated with coenzyme Q10 showed a trend toward slowing in TFC decline (13%) over 30 months (2.40- versus 2.74-point decline, p = 0.15), as well as beneficial trends in some secondary measures. There was increased frequency of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness with remacemide and increased frequency of stomach upset with coenzyme Q10. CONCLUSIONS: Neither remacemide nor coenzyme Q10, at the dosages studied, produced significant slowing in functional decline in early HD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.57.3.397

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reitan RM Wolfson D. The Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. Tuscon: Neuropsychology Press 1958.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 311

Metadata

Authors
The Huntington Study Group
Corresponding author
The Huntington Study Group
Venue
Neurology
Published
2001-08-14
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
397-404
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W4245847463
Cited by
312
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS R01-35284, R01NS035284)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00044, RR 01066, RR 07122, M01RR001066, M01RR000044, RR00042, RR 00645, M01RR000042, M01RR000645)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
Keywords
Huntington's disease, coenzyme Q10, remacemide, functional decline, total functional capacity, disease-modifying therapy, early-stage Huntington's disease, adverse events, nausea and vomiting
MeSH terms
Acetamides, Adult, Coenzymes, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Huntington Disease, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Time Factors, Ubiquinone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review