The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Double-blind, randomized trial of bupropion SR for the treatment of neuropathic pain
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bupropion sustained-release (SR) for the treatment of neuropathic pain. METHOD: This single-center, outpatient, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study consisted of two phases. Forty-one nondepressed patients with neuropathic pain spent 6 weeks in each phase in random order and received identical tablets of 150 mg bupropion SR or placebo. Patients were instructed to take one tablet once daily for 1 week followed by one tablet twice daily for 5 weeks. RESULTS: While the patients took bupropion SR, neuropathic pain relief was improved or much improved in 30 (73%) patients, and one of these patients became pain-free. The mean average pain score at baseline was 5.7, which remained unchanged at the end of week 6 with placebo, but decreased by 1.7 points to 4.0 (p < 0.001) during therapy with bupropion SR. Pain relief with bupropion SR was significant at week 2 (p < 0.05) and continued throughout weeks 3 through 6 (p < 0.001). A significant decrease in interference of pain on quality of life was observed while patients were receiving bupropion SR compared with placebo. Side effects experienced with bupropion SR were not dose-limiting and consisted primarily of dry mouth, insomnia, headache, gastrointestinal upset, tremor, constipation, and dizziness. CONCLUSION: This placebo-controlled crossover trial showed that bupropion SR (150-300 mg daily) was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision
Attal, N., Cruccu, G., Baron, R., Haanpää, M., Hansson, P., Jensen, T. S., & Nurmikko, T. (2010) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x · Cited by 1,873
Mendoza, T., Mayne, T., Rublee, D., & Cleeland, C. (2006) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.002 · Cited by 444
McCleane, G. (2008) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.2165/00023210-200822020-00005 · Cited by 109
Barrera, I., & Spiegel, D. (2014) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540261.2013.864259 · Cited by 75
Cepeda, M. S., Berlin, J. A., Gao, C. Y., Wiegand, F., & Wada, D. R. (2012) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01340.x · Cited by 71
Novel pharmacotherapy for fibromyalgia
Wood, P. B., Holman, A. J., & Jones, K. D. (2007) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1517/13543784.16.6.829 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Semenchuk, M. R., Sherman, S., & Davis, B.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2001-11-13
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1583-1588
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1989410928
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.