Cited by 444Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePain Mechanisms and Treatments

Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis

Mendoza, Tito, Mayne, Tracy, Rublee, Dale, Cleeland, Charles·2006·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

The Brief Pain Inventory short form (BPI‐sf) is a validated, widely used, self‐administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions. A modified version was used daily in randomised control trials of patients with arthritis undergoing treatment with cyclooxygenase‐2 specific inhibitors and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs. Results indicate that the modified BPI‐sf, much like the original scale, was internally reliable, consistent over time, and had good construct, as well as convergent and predictive validity in assessment of patients suffering from conditions of chronic pain. Each scale and individual pain intensity item refers to changes in osteoarthritis pain associated with medication use. The modified BPI‐sf, like the parent scale, is a valid and reliable tool for situations in which pain is assessed daily and minimises the burden placed on patients to record information necessary for scientific investigations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.002

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendoza, T., Mayne, T., Rublee, D., & Cleeland, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Mendoza, Tito
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
353-353
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2152763689
Cited by
444
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, osteoarthritis, pain assessment, questionnaire reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, predictive validity, COX-2 inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, chronic pain
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Chronic Disease, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review