The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Painful stimuli evoke itch in patients with chronic pruritus: Central sensitization for itch
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Central sensitization for pain is important for patients with chronic pain. The authors investigated a possible role of central sensitization for itch in patients with chronic pruritus. METHODS: Noxious stimuli were applied in lesional and visually nonlesional skin areas of 25 patients with atopic dermatitis, in lesional skin areas of 9 patients with psoriasis vulgaris, and in 20 healthy subjects. The stimuli included mechanical pinpricks, electrical stimuli, contact heat, and injection of low-pH solution. Intensities of itch and pain were assessed separately on a numeric rating scale. RESULTS: All the noxious stimuli primarily evoked pain in control subjects and patients with psoriasis vulgaris. In patients with atopic dermatitis, however, itch was evoked instead of burning pain. In their lesional skin, itch was the predominant sensation. Chemical stimuli evoked intense itch in lesional and visually healthy skin areas (the area under the curve of itch rating compared with the control, mean +/- SEM, 668 +/- 166 and 625 +/- 192 vs 38 +/- 23; p < 0.001; p < 0.01). Chemically induced itch also was observed in healthy subjects after a conditioning histamine stimulus of 15 minutes, but not after a conditioning histamine stimulus of 2 minutes. CONCLUSION: The chronic barrage of pruriceptive input may elicit central sensitization for itch so that nociceptive input no longer inhibits itch but on the contrary is perceived as itch. In contrast to the well-known A-fiber-mediated alloknesis and hyperknesis, this type of central sensitization appears to be elicited by C-nociceptors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physiology and Pathophysiology of Itch
Cevikbas, F., & Lerner, E. A. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00017.2019 · Cited by 282
Steinhoff, M., Suárez, A., Feramisco, J., & Koo, J. (2012) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-1188 · Cited by 263
Peripheral itch sensitization in atopic dermatitis
Tominaga, M., & Takamori, K. (2022) · Allergology International · doi:10.1016/j.alit.2022.04.003 · Cited by 160
Biopsychosocial mechanisms of chronic itch in patients with skin diseases: a review
Verhoeven, E. W. M., De Klerk, S., Kraaimaat, F. W., Van de Kerkhof, P. C. M., De Jong, E. M. G. J., & Evers, A. W. M. (2008) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-0452 · Cited by 126
Cognitive, behavioral, and physiological reactivity to chronic itching: analogies to chronic pain
Verhoeven, L., Kraaimaat, F., Duller, P., Kerkhof, P. V. D., & Evers, A. (2006) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15327558ijbm1303_7 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Ikoma, A., Fartasch, M., Heyer, G., Miyachi, Y., Handwerker, H., & Schmelz, M.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2004-01-27
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 212-217
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W1970404910
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Painful stimuli evoke itch in patients with chronic pruritus: Central sensitization for itch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.62.2.212
- The paper
- Ikoma, A., Fartasch, M., Heyer, G., Miyachi, Y., Handwerker, H., & Schmelz, M. (2004). Painful stimuli evoke itch in patients with chronic pruritus: Central sensitization for itch. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.62.2.212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.