Cited by 54Dermatology and Skin DiseasesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Cognitive, behavioral, and physiological reactivity to chronic itching: analogies to chronic pain

Verhoeven, Lisette, Kraaimaat, Floris, Duller, Piet, Kerkhof, Peter van de, Evers, Andrea·2006·International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

It is well-known that cognitive, behavioral, and physiological reactivity to pain, such as catastrophizing, avoidance of activity, and increased physiological responses, can unfavorably affect long-term outcomes in patients with chronic pain. In line with similarities between the psychophysiology of pain and itching, corresponding mechanisms may be relevant for the maintenance of chronic itching. The goal of this study was to examine the role of self-reported cognitive, behavioral, and physiological reactivity factors on itching-related outcomes in 235 patients with chronic skin diseases suffering from chronic itching. Sequential regression analyses indicate that all 3 reactivity systems predicted itching-related outcomes. Specifically, more catastrophizing, higher levels of avoidance of activity, and heightened self-reported physiological reactivity predicted more itching, more scratching, and a reduced disease-related quality of life. The results suggest that a psychological model as described for chronic pain is a useful starting point for study of the maintaining mechanisms of chronic itching.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1303_7

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verhoeven, L., Kraaimaat, F., Duller, P., Kerkhof, P. V. D., & Evers, A.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Verhoeven, Lisette
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2006-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
237-243
ISSN
  • 1070-5503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7558
OpenAlex
W2071121977
Cited by
54
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
pruritus, chronic pain, pain catastrophizing, activity avoidance, physiological reactivity, scratching behavior, quality of life, chronic skin disease, psychophysiology, maintenance mechanisms
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Arousal, Chronic Disease, Defense Mechanisms, Dermatitis, Atopic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pruritus, Psoriasis, Quality of Life, Sick Role, Statistics as Topic, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review