Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 545

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology: Is There a Recommended Number of Cases for Anesthetic Procedures?

Konrad, Christoph, Schupfer, Guido, Wietlisbach, Markus, Gerber, Helmut·1998·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

The learning process is a multidimensional function with a wide intra-and interindividual scattering. To determine the learning process in anesthesia, we evaluated 11 first-year residents according to their rate of success or failure when applying manual anesthesiological skills, such as performance of spinal, epidural, or brachial plexus anesthesia and tracheal intubation or insertion of an arterial line. Epidural anesthesia was the most difficult procedure (P < 0.05). Significant differences were found between epidural anesthesia and tracheal intubation (P < 0.05), insertion of an arterial line (P < 0.05), and brachial plexus block (P < 0.05), as well as between spinal anesthesia and orotracheal intubation (P < 0.05). Learning curves are a valid tool for monitoring institutional and individual success. Implications: To investigate the learning process in anesthesia, typical anesthetic procedures were performed by inexperienced residents during their first year. Learning curves were generated for each procedure performed. Epidural anesthesia was the most difficult procedure to perform (P < 0.05). (Anesth Analg 1998;86:635-9)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1213/00000539-199803000-00037

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 545

Metadata

Authors
Konrad, C., Schupfer, G., Wietlisbach, M., & Gerber, H.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
1998-03
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
635-639
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4231740166
Cited by
545
References
0
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology: Is There a Recommended Number of Cases for Anesthetic Procedures? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/00000539-199803000-00037
The paper
Konrad, C., Schupfer, G., Wietlisbach, M., & Gerber, H. (1998). Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology: Is There a Recommended Number of Cases for Anesthetic Procedures? Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199803000-00037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.