The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology: Is There a Recommended Number of Cases for Anesthetic Procedures?
Abstract
The learning process is a multidimensional function with a wide intra-and interindividual scattering. To determine the learning process in anesthesia, we evaluated 11 first-year residents according to their rate of success or failure when applying manual anesthesiological skills, such as performance of spinal, epidural, or brachial plexus anesthesia and tracheal intubation or insertion of an arterial line. Epidural anesthesia was the most difficult procedure (P < 0.05). Significant differences were found between epidural anesthesia and tracheal intubation (P < 0.05), insertion of an arterial line (P < 0.05), and brachial plexus block (P < 0.05), as well as between spinal anesthesia and orotracheal intubation (P < 0.05). Learning curves are a valid tool for monitoring institutional and individual success. Implications: To investigate the learning process in anesthesia, typical anesthetic procedures were performed by inexperienced residents during their first year. Learning curves were generated for each procedure performed. Epidural anesthesia was the most difficult procedure to perform (P < 0.05). (Anesth Analg 1998;86:635-9)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Video‐laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature
NIFOROPOULOU, P., PANTAZOPOULOS, I., DEMESTIHA, T., KOUDOUNA, E., & XANTHOS, T. (2010) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02285.x · Cited by 316
Kleine-Brueggeney, M., Greif, R., Schoettker, P., Savoldelli, G. L., Nabecker, S., & Theiler, L. G. (2016) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aew058 · Cited by 216
Pieters, B. M. A., Wilbers, N. E. R., Huijzer, M., Winkens, B., & van Zundert, A. A. J. (2016) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.13413 · Cited by 67
Kim, S. Y., Kim, K. N., Jeong, M. A., Lee, B. S., & Lim, H. J. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251712 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Konrad, C., Schupfer, G., Wietlisbach, M., & Gerber, H.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 635-639
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4231740166
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology: Is There a Recommended Number of Cases for Anesthetic Procedures? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/00000539-199803000-00037
- The paper
- Konrad, C., Schupfer, G., Wietlisbach, M., & Gerber, H. (1998). Learning Manual Skills in Anesthesiology: Is There a Recommended Number of Cases for Anesthetic Procedures? Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199803000-00037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.