Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of a Behavioral Pain Scale in Critically Ill, Sedated, and Mechanically Ventilated Patients

A??ssaoui, Youn??s, Zeggwagh, Amine Ali, Zekraoui, A??cha, Abidi, Khalid, Abouqal, Redouane·2005·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

In Brief Assessing pain in critically ill patients, particularly in nonverbal patients, is a great challenge. In this study, we validated a behavioral pain scale (BPS) in critically ill, sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients. The BPS score was the sum of 3 subscales that have a range score of 1–4: facial expression, upper limb movements, and compliance with mechanical ventilation. Two assessors observed and scored pain simultaneously with the BPS at rest and during painful procedures. The psychometric properties of the BPS that were studied were reliability, validity, and responsiveness. We achieved 360 observations in 30 patients. The BPS was internally reliable (Cronbach α = 0.72). The intraclass correlation coefficient to evaluate inter-rater reliability was high (0.95). Validity was demonstrated by the change in BPS scores, which were significantly higher during painful procedures, with averages of 3.9 ± 1.1 at rest and 6.8 ± 1.9 during procedures (P < 0.001), and by the principal components factor analysis, which revealed a large first-factor accounting for 65% of the variance in pain expression. The BPS exhibited excellent responsiveness, with an effect size ranging from 2.2 to 3.4. This study demonstrated that the BPS can be valid and reliable for measuring pain in noncommunicative intensive care unit patients. IMPLICATIONS: Despite interest in pain assessment in the intensive care unit (ICU), there is no specific pain scale for critical care patients and, particularly, for uncommunicative patients. This study demonstrated that a behavioral scale can be valid and reliable for measuring pain in ICU patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1213/01.ane.0000182331.68722.ff

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
A??ssaoui, Y., Zeggwagh, A. A., Zekraoui, A., Abidi, K., & Abouqal, R.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2005-11
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
1470-1476
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061260763
Cited by
262
References
23
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a Behavioral Pain Scale in Critically Ill, Sedated, and Mechanically Ventilated Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/01.ane.0000182331.68722.ff
The paper
A??ssaoui, Y., Zeggwagh, A. A., Zekraoui, A., Abidi, K., & Abouqal, R. (2005). Validation of a Behavioral Pain Scale in Critically Ill, Sedated, and Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000182331.68722.ff

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.