The Fitting of Straight Lines if Both Variables are Subject to Error

Open access

Wald, Abraham·1940·The Annals of Mathematical Statistics

DOI 10.1214/aoms/1177731868

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aoms/1177731868

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Untitled work
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., & Burgess, S. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv080 · Cited by 9,816
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400829828 · Cited by 9,467
Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations
Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914288 · Cited by 2,691
Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments
Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.4.69 · Cited by 2,355
Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics
Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03004-7 · Cited by 1,628
Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies
Hemani, G., Bowden, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy163 · Cited by 1,496
“An estimate of the causal effect can be obtained from a Wald ratio: the influence of the SNP-outcome effect divided by the SNP-exposure effect (23) (Appendix 1).”
Background
An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings
Sanderson, E., Davey Smith, G., Windmeijer, F., & Bowden, J. (2019) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy262 · Cited by 1,085
Use of the Extreme Groups Approach: A Critical Reexamination and New Recommendations.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., MacCallum, R. C., & Nicewander, W. A. (2005) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.10.2.178 · Cited by 732
Gasoline prices, fuel economy, and the energy paradox
Allcott, H., & Wozny, N. (2014) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00419 · Cited by 504
Bias in causal estimates from Mendelian randomization studies with weak instruments
Burgess, S., & Thompson, S. G. (2011) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4197 · Cited by 421
Assumptions of IV Methods for Observational Epidemiology.
Didelez, V., Meng, S., & Sheehan, N. A. (2010) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/09-sts316 · Cited by 214
The Role of Adiposity in Cardiometabolic Traits: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis
Fall, T., Hägg, S., Mägi, R., Ploner, A., Fischer, K., Horikoshi, M., Sarin, A.-P., Thorleifsson, G., Ladenvall, C., Kals, M., et al. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001474 · Cited by 203
Detecting and correcting for bias in Mendelian randomization analyses using Gene-by-Environment interactions.
Spiller, W., Slichter, D., Bowden, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy204 · Cited by 90
Improving bias and coverage in instrumental variable analysis with weak instruments for continuous and binary outcomes
Burgess, S., & Thompson, S. G. (2012) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4498 · Cited by 87
On estimating treatment effects under non‐compliance in randomized clinical trials: are intent‐to‐treat or instrumental variables analyses perfect solutions?
Bang, H., & Davis, C. E. (2007) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2663 · Cited by 35
Reporting and guidelines for mendelian randomization analysis: A systematic review of oncological studies
Lor, G. C. Y., Risch, H. A., Fung, W. T., Au Yeung, S. L., Wong, I. O. L., Zheng, W., & Pang, H. (2019) · Cancer Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.canep.2019.101577 · Cited by 27
Mendelian Randomization Analysis Dissects the Relationship between NAFLD, T2D, and Obesity and Provides Implications to Precision Medicine
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Graham, S., Pique-Regi, R., Dong, X. C., Chen, Y. E., Willer, C., & Liu, W. (2019) · doi:10.1101/657734 · Cited by 250

Authors: Wald, A.
Venue: The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
Publisher: Institute of Mathematical Statistics
Published: 1940-09
Volume: 11
Issue: 3
Pages: 284-300
ISSN: 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177731868
OpenAlex: W2080040321
Cited by: 900
References: 0
FWCI: 0.00
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review