Cited by 16EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Active semi-supervised transfer learning (ASTL) for offline BCI calibration

Open access
Wu, Dongrui·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)

Abstract

Single-trial classification of event-related potentials in electroencephalogram (EEG) signals is a very important paradigm of brain-computer interface (BCI). Because of individual differences, usually some subject-specific calibration data are required to tailor the classifier for each subject. Transfer learning has been extensively used to reduce such calibration data requirement, by making use of auxiliary data from similar/relevant subjects/tasks. However, all previous research assumes that all auxiliary data have been labeled. This paper considers a more general scenario, in which part of the auxiliary data could be unlabeled. We propose active semi-supervised transfer learning (ASTL) for offline BCI calibration, which integrates active learning, semi-supervised learning, and transfer learning. Using a visual evoked potential oddball task and three different EEG headsets, we demonstrate that ASTL can achieve consistently good performance across subjects and headsets, and it outperforms some state-of-the-art approaches in the literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/smc.2017.8122610

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transfer learning has been successfully used for BCIs.

    “Transfer learning (TL) [23], which utilizes information in source domains to improve the learning performance in a target domain, has also been successfully used for BCIs [12], [35], [36], [38], [39].”
  • There is no closed-form solution to the Riemannian mean, and it is usually computed by an iterative gradient descent algorithm.

    “There is no closed-form solution to (3), and it is usually computed by an iterative gradient descent algorithm [8].”

    From Transfer Learning for Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Euclidean Space Data Alignment Approach (2020) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Weighted Adaptation Regularization section defines equation (3) as class-specific sample weights, not a Riemannian mean. Searches for a Riemannian mean, a closed-form solution, and gradient descent found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. V. Jayaram, M. Alamgir, Y. Altun, B. Scholkopf, and M. Grosse- Wentrup, "Transfer learning in brain-computer interfaces," IEEE Com- putational Intelligence Magazine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 20-31, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, D.
Corresponding author
Wu, Dongrui
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-10
Pages
246-251
ISSN
1062-922X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964288883
Cited by
16
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
offline calibration, single-trial classification, event-related potentials, EEG, active learning (machine learning), semi-supervised learning, transfer learning, subject-specific calibration, EEG headset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review