Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Landscapes of Refuge and Resiliency: Native Californian Persistence at Tomales Bay, California, 1770s–1870s

Schneider, Tsim D., Panich, Lee M.·2019·Ethnohistory

Abstract

Research on Native American interactions with colonial institutions increasingly stresses the persistence of indigenous places and identities despite the challenges wrought by missionary, mercantile, and settler colonialism. This article expands on the theme of persistence through a case study investigating the various ways indigenous people, including Coast Miwok and Southern Pomo individuals, worked against and within colonial systems to maintain residency and autonomy in their ancestral homelands in central California. Focusing on the Tomales Bay area in what is now western Marin County as a refuge, the article examines the ethnohistorical evidence for long-term histories of indigenous persistence and strategic engagement with colonial peoples and processes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00141801-7217293

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Avery, 2009, Tomales Bay Environmental History and Historic Resource Study: Point Reyes National Seashore
  2. Baldy, 2013, Why We Gather: Traditional Gathering in Native Northwest California and the Future of Bio-Cultural Sovereignty, Ecological Processes, 2, 1, 10.1186/2192-1709-2-17 · DOI
  3. Bancroft, 1886, 1846–1848
  4. Barrett, 1908, The Ethno-geography of the Pomo and Neighboring Indians
  5. Bauer, 2009, “We Are All Like Migrant Workers Here”: Work, Community, and Memory on California’s Round Valley Reservation, 1850–1941
  6. Bauer, 2016, California through Native Eyes: Reclaiming History
  7. Chilcote, 2015, Pow Wows at the Mission: Identity and Federal Recognition for the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Mission Indians, Boletín, 31, 79
  8. Collier, 1996, Interviews with Tom Smith and Maria Copa: Isabel Kelly’s Ethnographic Notes on the Coast Miwok Indians of Marin and Southern Sonoma Counties, California
  9. Compas Lynn . 1998. “Research Design, Case Study, and Proposed Management Plan: Post-Contact Coast Miwok Settlement Patterns and Resource Procurement Strategies in Point Reyes National Seashore.” Master’s thesis, Sonoma State University.
  10. Cook, 1976, The Conflict between the California Indian and White Civilization, 10.1525/9780520326491 · DOI
  11. Cordero, 2015, Native Persistence: Marriage, Social Structure, Political Leadership, and Intertribal Relations at Mission Dolores, 1777–1800, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 35, 133
  12. 1871, The Black Will Case, Daily Alta California
  13. Dietz Stephen A. 1976. “Echa-Tamal: A Study of Coast Miwok Acculturation.” Master’s thesis, San Francisco State University.
  14. Edwards, 1964, Wandering Toponyms: El Puerto de la Bodega and Bodega Bay, Pacific Historical Review, 33, 253, 10.2307/3636835 · DOI
  15. Farris, 1998, The Bodega Miwok as Seen by Mikhail Tikhonovich Tikhanov in 1818, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 20, 2
  16. Field, 1999, Complicities and Collaborations: Anthropologists and the ‘Unacknowledged Tribes’ of California, Current Anthropology, 40, 193, 10.1086/200004 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Haas, 2014, Saints and Citizens: Indigenous Histories of Colonial Missions and Mexican California
  18. Hackel, 2005, Children of Coyote, Missionaries of Saint Francis: Indian-Spanish Relations in Colonial California, 1769–1850
  19. Hull, 2015, Quality of Life: Native Communities within and beyond the Bounds of Colonial Institutions in California, 222
  20. Hurtado, 1982, ‘Hardly a Farm House—A Kitchen without Them’: Indian and White Households on the California Borderland Frontier in 1860, Western Historical Quarterly, 13, 245, 10.2307/969413 · DOI
  21. Hurtado, 1988, Indian Survival on the California Frontier
  22. 1916, Mrs. George Wood Very Ill—Widow of the Famous Tom Vaquero First Settler of Tomales, Independent
  23. Jackson, 1995, Indians, Franciscans, and Spanish Colonization: The Impact of the Mission System on California Indians
  24. Jordan, 2013, Incorporation and Colonization: Postcolumbian Iroquois Satellite Communities and Processes of Indigenous Autonomy, American Anthropologist, 115, 29, 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01533.x · DOI
  25. Kelly, 1978, Coast Miwok, 414
  26. Kroeber, 1925, Handbook of the Indians of California
  27. Lauff, 2016, Reminiscences of Charles Lauff: Memories of an Early Marin County Pioneer
  28. Lelièvre, 2017, Unsettling Mobility: Mediating Mi’kmaw Sovereignty in Post-Contact Nova Scotia
  29. Lightfoot, 2005, Indians, Missionaries, and Merchants: The Legacy of Colonial Encounters on the California Frontiers
  30. Lindsay, 2012, Murder State: California’s Native American Genocide, 1846–1873, 10.2307/j.ctt1d9nqs3 · DOI
  31. Madley, 2016, An American Genocide: The United States and the California Indian Catastrophe
  32. Mancini, 2015, ‘In Contempt of Oblivion’: Censuses, Ethnogeography, and Hidden Indian Histories in Eighteenth-Century Southern New England, Ethnohistory, 62, 61, 10.1215/00141801-2821683 · DOI
  33. 1872, The Oldest Pioneer, Marin County Journal
  34. Mason, 1976, Earthquake Bay: A History of Tomales Bay, California
  35. Mason, 1976, The West’s First Paper Mill, Point Reyes Historian, 1, 43
  36. Milliken, 2009, Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783–1840
  37. Munro-Fraser, 1880, History of Marin County, California
  38. Newell, 2009, Constructing Lives at Mission San Francisco: Native Californians and Hispanic Colonists, 1776–1821
  39. Norton, 1979, When Our Worlds Cried: Genocide in Northwestern California
  40. Panich, 2010, Missionization and the Persistence of Native Identity on the Colonial Frontier of Baja California, Ethnohistory, 57, 225, 10.1215/00141801-2009-062 · DOI
  41. Panich, 2013, Archaeologies of Persistence: Reconsidering the Legacies of Colonialism in Native North America, American Antiquity, 78, 105, 10.7183/0002-7316.78.1.105 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Panich, 2015, ‘Sometimes They Bury the Deceased’s Clothes and Trinkets’: Indigenous Mortuary Practices at Mission Santa Clara de Asís, Historical Archaeology, 49, 110, 10.1007/BF03376983 · DOI
  43. Panich, 2015, Expanding Mission Archaeology: A Landscape Approach to Indigenous Autonomy in Colonial California, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 40, 48, 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.05.006 · DOI
  44. Panich, 2018, Finding Mid-Nineteenth Century Native Settlements: Cartographic and Archaeological Evidence from Central California, Journal of Field Archaeology, 43, 152, 10.1080/00934690.2017.1416849 · DOI
  45. Pawling, 2016, Wabanaki Homeland and Mobility: Concepts of Home in Nineteenth-Century Maine, Ethnohistory, 63, 621, 10.1215/00141801-3633232 · DOI
  46. Phillips, 1993, Indians and Intruders in Central California, 1769–1849
  47. Sarris, 2001, First Thoughts on Restoration: Notes from a Tribal Chairman, News from Native California, 12
  48. Schneider, 2010, Making Indian Land in the Allotment Era: Northern California’s Indian Rancherias, Western Historical Quarterly, 41, 429, 10.2307/westhistquar.41.4.429 · DOI
  49. Schneider, 2015, Envisioning Colonial Landscapes Using Mission Registers, Radiocarbon, and Stable Isotopes: An Experimental Approach from San Francisco Bay, American Antiquity, 80, 511, 10.7183/0002-7316.80.3.511 · DOI
  50. Schneider, 2015, Placing Refuge and the Archaeology Indigenous Hinterlands in Colonial California, American Antiquity, 80, 695, 10.7183/0002-7316.80.4.695 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Schneider, 2014, Native Agency at the Margins of Empire: Indigenous Landscapes, Spanish Missions, and Contested Histories, 5
  52. Silliman, 2001, Theoretical Perspectives on Labor and Colonialism: Reconsidering the California Missions, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 20, 379, 10.1006/jaar.2001.0383 · DOI
  53. Sousa, 2015, ‘An Influential Squaw’: Intermarriage and Community in Central California, 1839–1851, Ethnohistory, 62, 707, 10.1215/00141801-3135306 · DOI
  54. Sunseri, 2017, Capitalism as Nineteenth-Century Colonialism and Its Impacts on Native Californians, Ethnohistory, 64, 471, 10.1215/00141801-4174247 · DOI
  55. Thompson, 1877, Historical and Descriptive Sketch of Sonoma County
  56. Tovell, 2008, At the Far Reaches of Empire: The Life of Juan Francisco de la Bodega y Quadra, 10.59962/9780774855952 · DOI
  57. Tveskov, 2007, Social Identity and Culture Change on the Southern Northwest Coast, American Anthropologist, 109, 431, 10.1525/aa.2007.109.3.431 · DOI
  58. Vizenor, 2008, The Aesthetics of Survivance: Literary Theory and Practice, 1
  59. Wagner, 1931, The Last Spanish Exploration of the Northwest Coast and the Attempt to Colonize Bodega Bay, California Historical Society Quarterly, 10, 313, 10.2307/25160479 · DOI
  60. Wilkins, 1918, Days of the Dons: Reminiscences of California’s Oldest Native Son
  61. Zappia, 2014, Raiders and Traders: The Indigenous World of the Colorado Basin, 1540–1859, 10.5149/northcarolina/9781469615844.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, T. D., & Panich, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Santa Clara University
Venue
Ethnohistory
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
21-47
ISSN
  • 0014-1801
  • 1527-5477
Cited by
13
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review