The DOI matches its Crossref record.
VIRTUAL REALITY IN NEUROSURGICAL EDUCATION: PART-TASK VENTRICULOSTOMY SIMULATION WITH DYNAMIC VISUAL AND HAPTIC FEEDBACK
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mastery of the neurosurgical skill set involves many hours of supervised intraoperative training. Convergence of political, economic, and social forces has limited neurosurgical resident operative exposure. There is need to develop realistic neurosurgical simulations that reproduce the operative experience, unrestricted by time and patient safety constraints. Computer-based, virtual reality platforms offer just such a possibility. The combination of virtual reality with dynamic, three-dimensional stereoscopic visualization, and haptic feedback technologies makes realistic procedural simulation possible. Most neurosurgical procedures can be conceptualized and segmented into critical task components, which can be simulated independently or in conjunction with other modules to recreate the experience of a complex neurosurgical procedure. METHODS: We use the ImmersiveTouch (ImmersiveTouch, Inc., Chicago, IL) virtual reality platform, developed at the University of Illinois at Chicago, to simulate the task of ventriculostomy catheter placement as a proof-of-concept. Computed tomographic data are used to create a virtual anatomic volume. RESULTS: Haptic feedback offers simulated resistance and relaxation with passage of a virtual three-dimensional ventriculostomy catheter through the brain parenchyma into the ventricle. A dynamic three-dimensional graphical interface renders changing visual perspective as the user's head moves. The simulation platform was found to have realistic visual, tactile, and handling characteristics, as assessed by neurosurgical faculty, residents, and medical students. CONCLUSION: We have developed a realistic, haptics-based virtual reality simulator for neurosurgical education. Our first module recreates a critical component of the ventriculostomy placement task. This approach to task simulation can be assembled in a modular manner to reproduce entire neurosurgical procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jang, S., Vitale, J. M., Jyung, R. W., & Black, J. B. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.009 · Cited by 320
Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Kwok, A. P. K., Zhu, T., & Ma, X. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100429 · Cited by 281
Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Plastic Surgery: A Review
Kim, Y., Kim, H., & Kim, Y. O. (2017) · Archives of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.179 · Cited by 267
LeBlanc, J., Hutchison, C., Hu, Y., & Donnon, T. (2013) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.k.01284 · Cited by 66
Simulation in neurosurgery—a brief review and commentary
Cobb, M. I.-P. H., Taekman, J. M., Zomorodi, A. R., Gonzalez, L. F., & Turner, D. A. (2016) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.068 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemole, G. M., Banerjee, P. P., Luciano, C., Neckrysh, S., & Charbel, F. T.
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-149
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059205775
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VIRTUAL REALITY IN NEUROSURGICAL EDUCATION: PART-TASK VENTRICULOSTOMY SIMULATION WITH DYNAMIC VISUAL AND HAPTIC FEEDBACK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1227/01.neu.0000279734.22931.21
- The paper
- Lemole, G. M., Banerjee, P. P., Luciano, C., Neckrysh, S., & Charbel, F. T. (2007). VIRTUAL REALITY IN NEUROSURGICAL EDUCATION: PART-TASK VENTRICULOSTOMY SIMULATION WITH DYNAMIC VISUAL AND HAPTIC FEEDBACK. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000279734.22931.21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.